Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15831 - 15840 of 43513 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Kontraktor Pasang Interior Set Kamar Tidur Kecil Baturetno Wonogiri.

State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
set, only applicable at the end of the 6 months jail on the felony conviction. … Ct. 2.: Consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12127 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
and property division as set forth in a judgment of divorce entered by the circuit court. Valerie argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91724 - 2013-01-16

[PDF] State v. Eugene E. Volk
N.W.2d 846 (1999), cert. denied. We look first to the statutory language, and, if it does not set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2510 - 2017-09-19

State v. Brian Thomas
the requirements set forth in State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246, 267-72, 389 N.W.2d 12, 23-25 (1986), and § 971.08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8733 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gary L. Kluck
.... Id. at 474, 230 N.W.2d at 669. A "new factor" is: [A] fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9520 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
his trial date was set beyond the speedy trial date for good cause at the instance of Duffie’s counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113846 - 2014-06-10

State v. William M. Schleck
of discretion should be set forth. Id. Therefore, when we review a discretionary determination, we examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2653 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
) presents an issue of statutory interpretation. The interpretation of a statute to a given set of facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27888 - 2007-01-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is a fact, or a set of facts, “‘highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732531 - 2023-11-29

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Stynes
recused himself. Section 757.19(2), STATS., sets forth seven situations in which a judge shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13186 - 2017-09-21