Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15951 - 15960 of 59063 for quit claim deed.
Search results 15951 - 15960 of 59063 for quit claim deed.
State v. Cleophus Amerson
personnel who interviewed Tawanda. Amerson rested his case without presenting any witnesses. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9791 - 2005-03-31
personnel who interviewed Tawanda. Amerson rested his case without presenting any witnesses. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9791 - 2005-03-31
Jeffrey A. Smith v. Menard, Inc.
this is a small claims action, we bear in mind that the circuit court has wider discretion on the type of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7265 - 2005-03-31
this is a small claims action, we bear in mind that the circuit court has wider discretion on the type of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7265 - 2005-03-31
Gerald Draves v. Gavin Priegel
for the claims of emotional distress, the court found those claims moot. The court ordered that the pleadings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2882 - 2005-03-31
for the claims of emotional distress, the court found those claims moot. The court ordered that the pleadings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2882 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34417 - 2008-11-03
and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34417 - 2008-11-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a small claims action. For the reasons set forth below, the circuit court’s order is affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257602 - 2020-04-16
a small claims action. For the reasons set forth below, the circuit court’s order is affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257602 - 2020-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficiency standpoint, the court would have required the transcripts to evaluate the defendant’s claims. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87403 - 2012-09-24
a sufficiency standpoint, the court would have required the transcripts to evaluate the defendant’s claims. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87403 - 2012-09-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of contract claim against The Riehl Stop, LLC, and a subsequent order reaffirming that decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634254 - 2023-03-21
of contract claim against The Riehl Stop, LLC, and a subsequent order reaffirming that decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634254 - 2023-03-21
[PDF]
Dale Marek v. David H. Schwarz
. Dale Marek appeals an order affirming the revocation of his probation. Marek claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24978 - 2017-09-21
. Dale Marek appeals an order affirming the revocation of his probation. Marek claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24978 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
and claiming he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. Counsel has filed a supplemental no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102167 - 2013-09-23
and claiming he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. Counsel has filed a supplemental no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102167 - 2013-09-23
CA Blank Order
that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues. Accordingly, we affirm. First, we agree with counsel that a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100221 - 2013-07-29
that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues. Accordingly, we affirm. First, we agree with counsel that a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100221 - 2013-07-29