Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1601 - 1610 of 12260 for 2012.
Search results 1601 - 1610 of 12260 for 2012.
[PDF]
WI APP 7
: December 12, 2012 Submitted on Briefs: September 25, 2012 Oral Argument: JUDGES: Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90425 - 2014-09-15
: December 12, 2012 Submitted on Briefs: September 25, 2012 Oral Argument: JUDGES: Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90425 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
standing to maintain their claim against Katia, and we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In early 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108400 - 2014-02-24
standing to maintain their claim against Katia, and we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In early 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108400 - 2014-02-24
[PDF]
WI APP 49
2012 WI APP 49 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2011AP1440
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79549 - 2014-09-15
2012 WI APP 49 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2011AP1440
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79549 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
of the potential for deportation. See 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2) (2012). Lopez would be unable to make a prima facie
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122862 - 2014-09-30
of the potential for deportation. See 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2) (2012). Lopez would be unable to make a prima facie
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122862 - 2014-09-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶2 In February 2012, Duncan was charged with operating while intoxicated (5th or 6th offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122857 - 2014-10-01
. ¶2 In February 2012, Duncan was charged with operating while intoxicated (5th or 6th offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122857 - 2014-10-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
you to drug treatment. You did – you missed January – March 30th 2012; April 19th, 2012; April 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119964 - 2014-09-15
you to drug treatment. You did – you missed January – March 30th 2012; April 19th, 2012; April 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119964 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
reappointment came at the instance of the court. At a hearing spanning April 24 and May 4, 2012, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99716 - 2013-07-23
reappointment came at the instance of the court. At a hearing spanning April 24 and May 4, 2012, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99716 - 2013-07-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to maintain their claim against Katia, and we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In early 2012, the Merciers’ house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108400 - 2017-09-21
to maintain their claim against Katia, and we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In early 2012, the Merciers’ house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108400 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 12
. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2012, A.C., an adult female, was sentenced to probation with six months of jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183046 - 2017-09-21
. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2012, A.C., an adult female, was sentenced to probation with six months of jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183046 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
), and Miller v. Alabama, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012).[2] We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118824 - 2014-08-04
), and Miller v. Alabama, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012).[2] We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118824 - 2014-08-04