Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1601 - 1610 of 87666 for n v.
Search results 1601 - 1610 of 87666 for n v.
State v. Feleipe Harris
, v. FELEIPE HARRIS, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8629 - 2005-03-31
, v. FELEIPE HARRIS, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8629 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Metz
rulings. See Dietrich v. Elliott, 190 Wis.2d 816, 823 & n.4, 528 N.W.2d 17, 20 & n.4 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15259 - 2005-03-31
rulings. See Dietrich v. Elliott, 190 Wis.2d 816, 823 & n.4, 528 N.W.2d 17, 20 & n.4 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15259 - 2005-03-31
State v. Wilfredo Melo
) whether the officer suspected the party was armed and dangerous. State v. Guy, 172 Wis.2d 86, 104 n.5, 492
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11060 - 2005-03-31
) whether the officer suspected the party was armed and dangerous. State v. Guy, 172 Wis.2d 86, 104 n.5, 492
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11060 - 2005-03-31
State v. Pervis Merritt
, v. PERVIS MERRITT, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9907 - 2005-03-31
, v. PERVIS MERRITT, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9907 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frederick F.
, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Frederick F., Respondent-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15250 - 2008-12-11
, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Frederick F., Respondent-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15250 - 2008-12-11
State v. Charles Jones
DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3374 - 2005-03-31
DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3374 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas J. McPhetridge
error. See Wis. Stat. § 809.15(1); see also Lee v. LIRC, 202 Wis. 2d 558, 560 n.1, 550 N.W.2d 449 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4890 - 2005-03-31
error. See Wis. Stat. § 809.15(1); see also Lee v. LIRC, 202 Wis. 2d 558, 560 n.1, 550 N.W.2d 449 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4890 - 2005-03-31
State v. Linda M. Henthorn
” test noted in Hamiel v. State, 92 Wis.2d 656, 665 n.4, 285 N.W.2d 639, 645 (1979), the camera stopped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12830 - 2005-03-31
” test noted in Hamiel v. State, 92 Wis.2d 656, 665 n.4, 285 N.W.2d 639, 645 (1979), the camera stopped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12830 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derek L. Naff
results, probable cause existed in this case. In State v. Swanson, 164 Wis. 2d 437, 453-54 n.6, 475 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5069 - 2005-03-31
results, probable cause existed in this case. In State v. Swanson, 164 Wis. 2d 437, 453-54 n.6, 475 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5069 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald G. Fedler
to the downstream waters. As the supreme court noted in Just v. Marinette County, 56 Wis. 2d 7, 24 n.6, 201 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4447 - 2005-03-31
to the downstream waters. As the supreme court noted in Just v. Marinette County, 56 Wis. 2d 7, 24 n.6, 201 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4447 - 2005-03-31