Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16001 - 16010 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 16001 - 16010 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was slurred, and that he swayed when he walked; he also failed field sobriety tests. The officer reviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647908 - 2023-04-25
was slurred, and that he swayed when he walked; he also failed field sobriety tests. The officer reviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647908 - 2023-04-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was slurred, and that he swayed when he walked; he also failed field sobriety tests. The officer reviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647909 - 2023-04-25
was slurred, and that he swayed when he walked; he also failed field sobriety tests. The officer reviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647909 - 2023-04-25
[PDF]
to conduct field sobriety testing and administer a preliminary breath test. Klump placed Brown under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882435 - 2024-11-27
to conduct field sobriety testing and administer a preliminary breath test. Klump placed Brown under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882435 - 2024-11-27
[PDF]
Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Willie Quattlebaum
used a two-prong test to reach this conclusion: whether there was a significant benefit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17245 - 2017-09-21
used a two-prong test to reach this conclusion: whether there was a significant benefit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17245 - 2017-09-21
State v. David E. Polnitz
at a girlfriend’s house. Buschmann testified that Polnitz then asked if he could take a “lie detector test” because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4583 - 2005-03-31
at a girlfriend’s house. Buschmann testified that Polnitz then asked if he could take a “lie detector test” because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4583 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Marcia K. Johnson
used a two-prong test to reach this conclusion: whether there was a significant benefit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17218 - 2017-09-21
used a two-prong test to reach this conclusion: whether there was a significant benefit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17218 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the stop by directing him to exit his vehicle in order to perform field sobriety tests. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783537 - 2024-04-02
of the stop by directing him to exit his vehicle in order to perform field sobriety tests. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783537 - 2024-04-02
State v. Raymond D. Wilson
, 464-65 (Ct. App. 1979). A two-pronged test is used to analyze questions of multiplicity. See Selmon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11764 - 2005-03-31
, 464-65 (Ct. App. 1979). A two-pronged test is used to analyze questions of multiplicity. See Selmon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11764 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Frank M. Kett
used a two-prong test to reach this conclusion: whether there was a significant benefit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17220 - 2017-09-21
used a two-prong test to reach this conclusion: whether there was a significant benefit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17220 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Frank M. Kett
used a two-prong test to reach this conclusion: whether there was a significant benefit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17219 - 2017-09-21
used a two-prong test to reach this conclusion: whether there was a significant benefit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17219 - 2017-09-21