Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16091 - 16100 of 85080 for ninth judicial district.
Search results 16091 - 16100 of 85080 for ninth judicial district.
State v. Teresa L. Bellows
: On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Phillip A. Koss, district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12309 - 2005-03-31
: On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Phillip A. Koss, district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12309 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Teresa L. Bellows
of Phillip A. Koss, district attorney, and Diane M. Resch, assistant district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12309 - 2017-09-21
of Phillip A. Koss, district attorney, and Diane M. Resch, assistant district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12309 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SCR CHAPTER 23
is established as the basis for judicial review. (4) Negotiation of legal rights or responsibilities
/sc/rules/chap23.pdf - 2023-08-15
is established as the basis for judicial review. (4) Negotiation of legal rights or responsibilities
/sc/rules/chap23.pdf - 2023-08-15
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
whether a proceeding’s priority status terminated, “no longer warrant[ing] judicial protection against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5205 - 2005-03-31
whether a proceeding’s priority status terminated, “no longer warrant[ing] judicial protection against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5205 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dawn M. Champion
ambiguity because it could reasonably be interpreted as opening the door to judicial sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4181 - 2005-03-31
ambiguity because it could reasonably be interpreted as opening the door to judicial sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4181 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lisa A. Carter
. “The exercise of our discretionary power to grant a new trial is to be done infrequently and judiciously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14142 - 2005-03-31
. “The exercise of our discretionary power to grant a new trial is to be done infrequently and judiciously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14142 - 2005-03-31
WI App 95 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2032 Complete Title ...
by the DFI. In order to answer the question, we must turn to the statute itself. ¶23 “Judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64248 - 2011-06-28
by the DFI. In order to answer the question, we must turn to the statute itself. ¶23 “Judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64248 - 2011-06-28
Bert L. Warnecke, Sr. v. Bert L. Warnecke II
the department to reverse its determination would be for him to have commenced a timely action for judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24663 - 2006-04-25
the department to reverse its determination would be for him to have commenced a timely action for judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24663 - 2006-04-25
[PDF]
State v. Joel L. Ritchie
to a warrant.” Id. at ¶22. When the judicial officer’s determination of probable cause is “doubtful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15766 - 2017-09-21
to a warrant.” Id. at ¶22. When the judicial officer’s determination of probable cause is “doubtful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15766 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dawn M. Champion
creates ambiguity because it could reasonably be interpreted as opening the door to judicial sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4181 - 2017-09-19
creates ambiguity because it could reasonably be interpreted as opening the door to judicial sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4181 - 2017-09-19