Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16131 - 16140 of 20932 for word.

COURT OF APPEALS
that the term “upon” was intended to have any temporal meaning whatsoever here. The awkwardly worded provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93997 - 2013-03-11

Stephen J. Highman v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
is one that directly contravenes the words of the statute, is clearly contrary to legislative intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2419 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
meant to pay attorney fees—in other words, to take attorney fees on attorney fees. Still, the court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79706 - 2012-03-20

WI App 57 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP938 Complete Title of ...
employment and indicates such intention by word or manner of action, or by conduct inconsistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80369 - 2012-05-30

2010 WI APP 38
. In other words, the circuit court, in deciding if an affidavit “is made on personal knowledge and sets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46691 - 2011-02-07

[PDF] Chandelle Enterprises, LLC v. XLNT Dairy Farm, Inc.
(1884). ¶12 The form of the description is, in other words, significant only to the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17903 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Lorna Amrhein v. Acuity
words, the inferences to be drawn from the underlying facts contained in the moving party’s material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6565 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company v. Ann Hernandez
create the zone of special danger out of which the injury arose. In other words, there is a causal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4055 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Russell L. Dawber
of the diversion agreement, and he described the wording of the agreement as “ambiguous.” The court disagreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5462 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
support. Sec. 802.05(2)(c), (3). Wisconsin courts “generally construe the word ‘may’ in a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638845 - 2023-03-29