Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16141 - 16150 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16141 - 16150 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶6 Lemel makes two arguments. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29760 - 2007-07-23
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶6 Lemel makes two arguments. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29760 - 2007-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. Van DE Hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54735 - 2010-09-22
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. Van DE Hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54735 - 2010-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether those facts are sufficient to create reasonable suspicion. Id. The reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32259 - 2008-03-26
review de novo whether those facts are sufficient to create reasonable suspicion. Id. The reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32259 - 2008-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in a way that denied a defendant due process is a question of constitutional fact we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91825 - 2014-09-15
in a way that denied a defendant due process is a question of constitutional fact we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91825 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
violates a defendant’s constitutional right is a question of law [that] this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48904 - 2014-09-15
violates a defendant’s constitutional right is a question of law [that] this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss for failure to state a claim de novo. Id., ¶17. ¶6 When Schubbe charged Schuler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465493 - 2021-12-22
to dismiss for failure to state a claim de novo. Id., ¶17. ¶6 When Schubbe charged Schuler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465493 - 2021-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. No. 2013AP891-CR 4 ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103683 - 2017-09-21
is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. No. 2013AP891-CR 4 ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103683 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“pass constitutional muster” is a question of law reviewed de novo. Id. ¶10 On appeal, Calzadas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147971 - 2017-09-21
“pass constitutional muster” is a question of law reviewed de novo. Id. ¶10 On appeal, Calzadas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147971 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. State v. Cole, 2000 WI App 52, ¶3, 233 Wis. 2d 577, 608 N.W.2d 432. ¶17 Johnson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55511 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. State v. Cole, 2000 WI App 52, ¶3, 233 Wis. 2d 577, 608 N.W.2d 432. ¶17 Johnson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55511 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184544 - 2017-09-21
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184544 - 2017-09-21