Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16171 - 16180 of 40222 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 16171 - 16180 of 40222 for financial disclosure statement.
Linda Premeau v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
, under Wis. Admin. Code § DWD 80.24, as a “statement … taken by a recording device.” The commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2201 - 2005-03-31
, under Wis. Admin. Code § DWD 80.24, as a “statement … taken by a recording device.” The commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2201 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the interest of David’s marriage or family, as shown by the marital purpose statements he signed. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128650 - 2017-09-21
in the interest of David’s marriage or family, as shown by the marital purpose statements he signed. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128650 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discretion involves ‘a statement on the record of the [circuit] court’s reasoned application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980295 - 2025-07-08
discretion involves ‘a statement on the record of the [circuit] court’s reasoned application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980295 - 2025-07-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statements to police should have been suppressed; (3) the plea procedures were adequate; and (4) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93884 - 2014-09-15
statements to police should have been suppressed; (3) the plea procedures were adequate; and (4) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93884 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
with it, the statements of staff members, and a statement submitted by Reveles. Staff member Sergeant Gerald Schroeder
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142575 - 2015-05-26
with it, the statements of staff members, and a statement submitted by Reveles. Staff member Sergeant Gerald Schroeder
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142575 - 2015-05-26
COURT OF APPEALS
“not only did the parties rely on Donald’s inaccurate statements as to his employment in creating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132238 - 2014-12-29
“not only did the parties rely on Donald’s inaccurate statements as to his employment in creating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132238 - 2014-12-29
State v. Darnetta Johnson
their motions to suppress evidence; (2) the trial court erred by allowing Johnson’s pre-Miranda statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11273 - 2010-06-14
their motions to suppress evidence; (2) the trial court erred by allowing Johnson’s pre-Miranda statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11273 - 2010-06-14
[PDF]
Randall G. Bobholz v. John Banaszak
, whether a statement constitutes a warranty is a question of fact for the circuit court. See Ewers v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5235 - 2017-09-19
, whether a statement constitutes a warranty is a question of fact for the circuit court. See Ewers v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5235 - 2017-09-19
State v. John W. Moore
). Although Moore identifies sixteen issues in his statement of issues, he only argues issues two through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14546 - 2005-03-31
). Although Moore identifies sixteen issues in his statement of issues, he only argues issues two through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14546 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donna J. Prill
complaint, which was in the form of a statement under oath, specified the penalty provisions applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4004 - 2005-03-31
complaint, which was in the form of a statement under oath, specified the penalty provisions applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4004 - 2005-03-31