Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16171 - 16180 of 61041 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 16171 - 16180 of 61041 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration. He argues that his sentence should be modified. We conclude Ziegler’s claim is barred by State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64065 - 2011-05-16
for reconsideration. He argues that his sentence should be modified. We conclude Ziegler’s claim is barred by State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64065 - 2011-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
se, appeals a small claims court order dismissing, with prejudice, his claims against Sharon Dvorak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100524 - 2013-08-07
se, appeals a small claims court order dismissing, with prejudice, his claims against Sharon Dvorak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100524 - 2013-08-07
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - March 2008
by the circuit court. The state claims that the six-year statute of limitations that was in effect at the time
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32009 - 2014-09-15
by the circuit court. The state claims that the six-year statute of limitations that was in effect at the time
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32009 - 2014-09-15
Mary F. Champine v. Milwaukee County
KESSLER, J. This appeal involves claims by a class (“Class”) of current and former non-union salaried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7531 - 2005-05-09
KESSLER, J. This appeal involves claims by a class (“Class”) of current and former non-union salaried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7531 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
Anthony Kish v. Health Personnel Options Corporation
, because the conversion claim was barred by the economic loss doctrine; not requiring Action to elect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13001 - 2017-09-21
, because the conversion claim was barred by the economic loss doctrine; not requiring Action to elect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13001 - 2017-09-21
State v. Davinne G. Taylor
involved. He claims that his lawyer: 1) should have objected when the State asked Taylor on cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3872 - 2005-03-31
involved. He claims that his lawyer: 1) should have objected when the State asked Taylor on cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3872 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 167
in evaluating the condemnor’s claim that, despite the plain language of WIS. STAT. § 32.06(8), substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56671 - 2014-09-15
in evaluating the condemnor’s claim that, despite the plain language of WIS. STAT. § 32.06(8), substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56671 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
, and Taylor, JJ. ¶1 GRAHAM, J. Jayne Rufener Rauch brings a negligence claim against Attorney Lance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=838462 - 2024-08-15
, and Taylor, JJ. ¶1 GRAHAM, J. Jayne Rufener Rauch brings a negligence claim against Attorney Lance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=838462 - 2024-08-15
2010 WI APP 167
specific to the interpretation of eminent domain statutes in evaluating the condemnor’s claim that, despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56671 - 2011-08-21
specific to the interpretation of eminent domain statutes in evaluating the condemnor’s claim that, despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56671 - 2011-08-21
H. Elaine Stipetich v. William J. Grosshans
of the respondents Stephen B. Tupper, William J. Grosshans and the Department of Corrections on her claims of sex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15443 - 2005-03-31
of the respondents Stephen B. Tupper, William J. Grosshans and the Department of Corrections on her claims of sex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15443 - 2005-03-31