Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16181 - 16190 of 58596 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Willie S. Davis
- incrimination; and (3) trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to impeach a witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20259 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Philipsen seeks a new trial, arguing that defense counsel2 was constitutionally ineffective for several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558486 - 2022-08-23

[PDF] WI APP 31
was the first to go to trial. Id., ¶8. ¶5 Over the course of a nine-day trial, the two sides presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92448 - 2017-09-21

WI App 31 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP232-AC Complete Title ...
. 2d 510, ¶8 & nn.6-7. After extensive discovery, Pharmacia was the first to go to trial. Id., ¶8. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92448 - 2013-11-17

COURT OF APPEALS
, the trial court concluded Schroeder was not entitled to double damages under the dog injury statute, Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118461 - 2014-07-28

[PDF] State v. James Tanksley
motion for a new trial. He raises four arguments relating to his right to counsel, evidentiary matters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18618 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as a party to the crime. He argues that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in two respects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250993 - 2019-12-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of dachshunds, the trial court concluded Schroeder was not entitled to double damages under the dog injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118461 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jeffrey S. Kimbrough
At trial, both the State and the defense called clinical psychologists who agreed that Kimbrough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2892 - 2005-03-31

M&I Bank South Central v. Neil C. Lofberg
. WEDEMEYER, P.J. Supervalu Holdings, Inc. (Supervalu) appeals from a final order of the trial court denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12752 - 2005-03-31