Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16271 - 16280 of 30191 for de.
Search results 16271 - 16280 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
cause to give [the defendant] a preliminary-breath test is a legal issue that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124310 - 2017-09-21
cause to give [the defendant] a preliminary-breath test is a legal issue that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 17
a question of law that we review de novo. See Wilke v. City of Appleton, 197 Wis. 2d 717, 726, 541 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34744 - 2014-09-15
a question of law that we review de novo. See Wilke v. City of Appleton, 197 Wis. 2d 717, 726, 541 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34744 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Quinton K. Washington
or prejudicial are legal issues that we review de novo. Id. We now address each of Washington’s alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10844 - 2017-09-20
or prejudicial are legal issues that we review de novo. Id. We now address each of Washington’s alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10844 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law for our de novo review. Belding II, 2014 WI 8, ¶13, 352 Wis. 2d at 366, 843 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112478 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law for our de novo review. Belding II, 2014 WI 8, ¶13, 352 Wis. 2d at 366, 843 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112478 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
purposes is a question of law which we review de novo. Morgan, 254 Wis. 2d 602, ¶11. ¶10 We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34361 - 2014-09-15
purposes is a question of law which we review de novo. Morgan, 254 Wis. 2d 602, ¶11. ¶10 We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34361 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that she “reviewed all the records for this account” and “ma[de] this Affidavit based upon personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94377 - 2013-03-25
that she “reviewed all the records for this account” and “ma[de] this Affidavit based upon personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94377 - 2013-03-25
Evelyn Ferrer v. David I. Lopez
, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Ansani v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15406 - 2005-03-31
, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Ansani v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15406 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tecia D.B.
termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6836 - 2005-03-31
termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6836 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
unless clearly erroneous, but we review the legal standards for ineffective assistance de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
unless clearly erroneous, but we review the legal standards for ineffective assistance de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
State v. Gary A. Michels
that this court reviews de novo. See id. at 302. ¶6 The statute in question, Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4672 - 2005-03-31
that this court reviews de novo. See id. at 302. ¶6 The statute in question, Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4672 - 2005-03-31