Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16331 - 16340 of 30081 for de.
Search results 16331 - 16340 of 30081 for de.
2007 WI APP 209
to interpret the applicable statutes as applied to the amended complaint. We interpret statutes de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29960 - 2007-09-25
to interpret the applicable statutes as applied to the amended complaint. We interpret statutes de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29960 - 2007-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2023AP1308 10 judgment de novo. See State v. Bobby G., 2007 WI 77, ¶36, 301 Wis. 2d 531, 734 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=797534 - 2024-05-08
2023AP1308 10 judgment de novo. See State v. Bobby G., 2007 WI 77, ¶36, 301 Wis. 2d 531, 734 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=797534 - 2024-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. See State v. Locke, 177 Wis. 2d 590, 596, 502 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28487 - 2007-03-19
review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. See State v. Locke, 177 Wis. 2d 590, 596, 502 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28487 - 2007-03-19
[PDF]
WI APP 18
of review ¶7 Interpretation of WIS. STAT. ch. 785 is a question of law that we review de novo. Rosario
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31615 - 2014-09-15
of review ¶7 Interpretation of WIS. STAT. ch. 785 is a question of law that we review de novo. Rosario
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31615 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey R. Groth
instruction violated a defendant’s right to due process is a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4574 - 2017-09-19
instruction violated a defendant’s right to due process is a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4574 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 28
¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77488 - 2014-09-15
¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77488 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ronald G. Sorenson
requires an interpretation of Wis. Stat. ch. 980. We review statutory interpretation questions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17449 - 2017-09-21
requires an interpretation of Wis. Stat. ch. 980. We review statutory interpretation questions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17449 - 2017-09-21
Shannon E. T. v. Alicia M. V.M.
. Whether a complaint states a claim for relief presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25288 - 2006-06-27
. Whether a complaint states a claim for relief presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25288 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
WI App 62
. ¶10 The Birges appeal.3 DISCUSSION ¶11 “We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012075 - 2025-11-20
. ¶10 The Birges appeal.3 DISCUSSION ¶11 “We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012075 - 2025-11-20
[PDF]
State v. Xavier J. Rockette
reports, while not meaningless, is de minimis upon the evidence and testimony at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25320 - 2017-09-21
reports, while not meaningless, is de minimis upon the evidence and testimony at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25320 - 2017-09-21