Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16341 - 16350 of 65135 for or b.
Search results 16341 - 16350 of 65135 for or b.
WI App 36 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP1522-FT Complete Title...
Title of Case: ††Petition for Review Dismissed Rhiannon B. Wolf, Plaintiff-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136448 - 2015-04-28
Title of Case: ††Petition for Review Dismissed Rhiannon B. Wolf, Plaintiff-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136448 - 2015-04-28
Jeffrey S. * v. Thomas A.f. *
, "[b]ecause the exercise of discretion is so essential to the trial court's functioning, we generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9151 - 2005-03-31
, "[b]ecause the exercise of discretion is so essential to the trial court's functioning, we generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9151 - 2005-03-31
Jay Vercauteren v. Rainbow Insulators, Inc.
(a) in denying his attorney-fee request, (b) in failing to award “enhanced wages” under § 109.11(2)(a),[1] and (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13850 - 2005-03-31
(a) in denying his attorney-fee request, (b) in failing to award “enhanced wages” under § 109.11(2)(a),[1] and (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13850 - 2005-03-31
WI App 4 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2243-CR Complete Title ...
of the victim, as defined in [Wis. Stat. §] 950.02(4). Sec. 971.10(3)(b). The issue is whether the provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105578 - 2014-01-28
of the victim, as defined in [Wis. Stat. §] 950.02(4). Sec. 971.10(3)(b). The issue is whether the provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105578 - 2014-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a). The defendant bears the burden of proving the foregoing factors. See § 973.20(14)(b). ¶5 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33621 - 2008-08-04
)(a). The defendant bears the burden of proving the foregoing factors. See § 973.20(14)(b). ¶5 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33621 - 2008-08-04
State v. Donald J. Buford
that Buford knowingly waived his right to testify. B. Ineffective Assistance Claim. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31
that Buford knowingly waived his right to testify. B. Ineffective Assistance Claim. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31
Douglas Ingram v. David H. Schwarz
Wis. Adm. Code § HA 2 app. Note: HA 2.05. Wisconsin Adm. Code § HA 2.05(5)(b) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13669 - 2005-03-31
Wis. Adm. Code § HA 2 app. Note: HA 2.05. Wisconsin Adm. Code § HA 2.05(5)(b) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13669 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kelvin Griffin
) (we generally will not review issues raised for the first time on appeal).[3] B. Unduly Harsh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8573 - 2005-03-31
) (we generally will not review issues raised for the first time on appeal).[3] B. Unduly Harsh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8573 - 2005-03-31
State v. Demetrius Newman
in that it is either (a) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (b) capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13946 - 2005-03-31
in that it is either (a) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (b) capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13946 - 2005-03-31
Rule Order
of this jurisdiction, or (b) another jurisdiction but only after such a determination and its geographical scope have
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84595 - 2012-07-26
of this jurisdiction, or (b) another jurisdiction but only after such a determination and its geographical scope have
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84595 - 2012-07-26