Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16441 - 16450 of 30081 for de.
Search results 16441 - 16450 of 30081 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is sufficient to support a conviction is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100732 - 2017-09-21
is sufficient to support a conviction is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100732 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wisconsin Gifts, Inc. v. City of Oak Creek
The trial court granted summary judgment in the City’s favor. We review summary judgments de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24522 - 2017-09-21
The trial court granted summary judgment in the City’s favor. We review summary judgments de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24522 - 2017-09-21
2010 WI APP 125
‘used as a doctor’s office’ is a matter of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo.” St
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53131 - 2011-08-21
‘used as a doctor’s office’ is a matter of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo.” St
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53131 - 2011-08-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Burgess
review de novo. State v. Webster, 196 Wis. 2d 308, 316, 538 N.W.2d 810 (Ct. App. 1995). Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3258 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. State v. Webster, 196 Wis. 2d 308, 316, 538 N.W.2d 810 (Ct. App. 1995). Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3258 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Shannon E. T. v. Alicia M. V.M.
of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶6. ¶6 The resolution of the motion to dismiss here requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25288 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶6. ¶6 The resolution of the motion to dismiss here requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25288 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Carrie L. Zillmer v. Orpheum Theatre Project, LLC
We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21711 - 2017-09-21
We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21711 - 2017-09-21
Kevin Thomas v. David H. Schwarz
parties likewise agreed that our review is de novo. At oral argument, however, the Respondents argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25770 - 2006-08-06
parties likewise agreed that our review is de novo. At oral argument, however, the Respondents argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25770 - 2006-08-06
Dale Vogel v. Grant-Lafayette Electric Cooperative
& Des Rochers, S.C., of St. Nazianz. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7819 - 2005-03-31
& Des Rochers, S.C., of St. Nazianz. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7819 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Mettler v. Nellis, 2005 WI App 73, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101465 - 2013-08-28
judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Mettler v. Nellis, 2005 WI App 73, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101465 - 2013-08-28
[PDF]
Westby-Coon Valley State Bank v. Hiram Lund
the trial court, and we review its decision de novo. Grosskopf Oil, Inc. v. Winter, 156 Wis.2d 575, 581
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12272 - 2017-09-21
the trial court, and we review its decision de novo. Grosskopf Oil, Inc. v. Winter, 156 Wis.2d 575, 581
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12272 - 2017-09-21