Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16461 - 16470 of 30081 for de.
Search results 16461 - 16470 of 30081 for de.
Kevin Thomas v. David H. Schwarz
parties likewise agreed that our review is de novo. At oral argument, however, the Respondents argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25770 - 2006-08-06
parties likewise agreed that our review is de novo. At oral argument, however, the Respondents argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25770 - 2006-08-06
Dale Vogel v. Grant-Lafayette Electric Cooperative
& Des Rochers, S.C., of St. Nazianz. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7819 - 2005-03-31
& Des Rochers, S.C., of St. Nazianz. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7819 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Mettler v. Nellis, 2005 WI App 73, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101465 - 2013-08-28
judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Mettler v. Nellis, 2005 WI App 73, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101465 - 2013-08-28
[PDF]
Westby-Coon Valley State Bank v. Hiram Lund
the trial court, and we review its decision de novo. Grosskopf Oil, Inc. v. Winter, 156 Wis.2d 575, 581
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12272 - 2017-09-21
the trial court, and we review its decision de novo. Grosskopf Oil, Inc. v. Winter, 156 Wis.2d 575, 581
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12272 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
to [Attorney Brandt's] professional dilemma is understandable, but his leniency is misplaced. . . . A de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36731 - 2009-06-08
to [Attorney Brandt's] professional dilemma is understandable, but his leniency is misplaced. . . . A de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36731 - 2009-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
moved for de novo review, and the circuit court held an evidentiary hearing on two separate dates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138584 - 2015-03-30
moved for de novo review, and the circuit court held an evidentiary hearing on two separate dates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138584 - 2015-03-30
[PDF]
Gary L. Addison v. Grant County
-1815 13 de novo. See DNR, 184 Wis.2d at 189, 515 N.W.2d at 892 (application of a statute
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11022 - 2017-09-19
-1815 13 de novo. See DNR, 184 Wis.2d at 189, 515 N.W.2d at 892 (application of a statute
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11022 - 2017-09-19
Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins
, and therefore presents a question of law which we decide de novo. See Stockbridge Sch. Dist. v. DPI, 202 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12941 - 2005-03-31
, and therefore presents a question of law which we decide de novo. See Stockbridge Sch. Dist. v. DPI, 202 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12941 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lafayette County Human Services v. Gary A.S.
presented is one of statutory construction, a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2340 - 2017-09-19
presented is one of statutory construction, a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2340 - 2017-09-19
State v. Xavier J. Rockette
that the impact of “non-disclosure of the police reports, while not meaningless, is de minimis upon the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25320 - 2006-06-27
that the impact of “non-disclosure of the police reports, while not meaningless, is de minimis upon the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25320 - 2006-06-27