Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16461 - 16470 of 29735 for des.
Search results 16461 - 16470 of 29735 for des.
State v. Carl F. Hickman
decides de novo. See Pritsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ANALYSIS Nature and Consequences of the Plea ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2101 - 2005-03-31
decides de novo. See Pritsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ANALYSIS Nature and Consequences of the Plea ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2101 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Emmanuel O. Okoronta
review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). Counsel is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3101 - 2017-09-20
review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). Counsel is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3101 - 2017-09-20
T & T Masonry, Inc. v. Roxton Associates
de novo, id. at 496, 536 N.W.2d at 182, it is necessary here to first address what appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9839 - 2005-03-31
de novo, id. at 496, 536 N.W.2d at 182, it is necessary here to first address what appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9839 - 2005-03-31
Universal Foods Corporation v. Elizabeth A. Zande
Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3495 - 2005-03-31
Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3495 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶15 We review a denial of summary judgment de novo, applying the same well-established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115737 - 2017-09-21
. DISCUSSION ¶15 We review a denial of summary judgment de novo, applying the same well-established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115737 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Eliud Velez v. Jon Litscher
penological interest. Velez puts the word “policy” in quotation marks, and refers to it as a “de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6628 - 2017-09-19
penological interest. Velez puts the word “policy” in quotation marks, and refers to it as a “de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6628 - 2017-09-19
Pamela J. Kranski v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
of an insurance contract presents this court with a question of law, which we review de novo. Smith v. Katz, 226
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16095 - 2005-03-31
of an insurance contract presents this court with a question of law, which we review de novo. Smith v. Katz, 226
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16095 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kris J. Kavelaris v. MSI Insurance Company
of law that we review de novo. See Aurora Med. Group v. DWD, 2000 No. 00-2984 4 WI 70
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3224 - 2017-09-19
of law that we review de novo. See Aurora Med. Group v. DWD, 2000 No. 00-2984 4 WI 70
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3224 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Patrick Heil v. Green Bay Police and Fire Commission
raise questions of law that we review de novo without deference to the trial court. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4138 - 2017-09-20
raise questions of law that we review de novo without deference to the trial court. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4138 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. James W. Rice, Jr.
of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Garcia, 195 Wis. 2d 68, 73, 535 N.W.2d 124 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2555 - 2017-09-19
of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Garcia, 195 Wis. 2d 68, 73, 535 N.W.2d 124 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2555 - 2017-09-19