Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16521 - 16530 of 30154 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Ronald Keith
: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Roggensack, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11268 - 2017-09-19

WI App 144 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2466 Complete Title o...
summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104321 - 2013-12-17

[PDF] WI App 62
. ¶10 The Birges appeal.3 DISCUSSION ¶11 “We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012075 - 2025-11-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo.” Id. ¶37 As explained above, the trial court modified WIS JI—CIVIL 8015 to accurately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611401 - 2023-01-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the parties regarding the standard of review. They agree that the de novo standard applies to resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261689 - 2020-05-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
is unconstitutional is a question of law that we review de novo. E.g., State v. Wood, 2010 WI 17, ¶15, 323 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529131 - 2022-07-19

[PDF] State v. Jamie L. Pennington
; however, whether a person is “in custody” for Miranda purposes is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5782 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Jeffrey Knight v. Milwaukee County
, Jeanne and Norris Knight [address deleted] began to assume de facto decision-making power for [Muriel K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2462 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Susann M. Vander Wielen v. Ronald E. Van Asten
of WIS. STAT. ch. 704. We thus have before us only questions of law, which we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19710 - 2017-09-21

Lyman Lumber of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Yourchuck Video, Inc.
loss doctrine preempted it. We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7272 - 2005-03-31