Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16561 - 16570 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16561 - 16570 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo.” Id. ¶37 As explained above, the trial court modified WIS JI—CIVIL 8015 to accurately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611401 - 2023-01-18
de novo.” Id. ¶37 As explained above, the trial court modified WIS JI—CIVIL 8015 to accurately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611401 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
Lafayette County Human Services v. Gary A.S.
presented is one of statutory construction, a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2340 - 2017-09-19
presented is one of statutory construction, a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2340 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324157 - 2021-01-14
reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324157 - 2021-01-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the parties regarding the standard of review. They agree that the de novo standard applies to resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261689 - 2020-05-21
the parties regarding the standard of review. They agree that the de novo standard applies to resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261689 - 2020-05-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
is unconstitutional is a question of law that we review de novo. E.g., State v. Wood, 2010 WI 17, ¶15, 323 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529131 - 2022-07-19
is unconstitutional is a question of law that we review de novo. E.g., State v. Wood, 2010 WI 17, ¶15, 323 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529131 - 2022-07-19
[PDF]
State v. Jamie L. Pennington
; however, whether a person is “in custody” for Miranda purposes is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5782 - 2017-09-19
; however, whether a person is “in custody” for Miranda purposes is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5782 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Miguel Gallego v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
review de novo the circuit court’s dismissal of Gallego’s complaint for failure to state a claim. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20002 - 2017-09-21
review de novo the circuit court’s dismissal of Gallego’s complaint for failure to state a claim. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20002 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
those findings are clearly erroneous. Second, we conduct an independent, de novo analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968499 - 2025-06-10
those findings are clearly erroneous. Second, we conduct an independent, de novo analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968499 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The determination of counsel’s effectiveness, in contrast, is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186160 - 2017-09-21
). The determination of counsel’s effectiveness, in contrast, is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186160 - 2017-09-21
Barbara B. v. Dorian H.
Barbara sought review in circuit court. There, the Honorable Barbara A. Kluka conducted a de novo review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16798 - 2013-03-06
Barbara sought review in circuit court. There, the Honorable Barbara A. Kluka conducted a de novo review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16798 - 2013-03-06