Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16581 - 16590 of 68197 for law.
Search results 16581 - 16590 of 68197 for law.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subsequent refusal to submit to an evidentiary breath test under implied consent laws should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449319 - 2021-11-04
subsequent refusal to submit to an evidentiary breath test under implied consent laws should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449319 - 2021-11-04
COURT OF APPEALS
that, pursuant to federal law, the Internal Revenue Service would impute interest on any excess capital payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63390 - 2011-05-02
that, pursuant to federal law, the Internal Revenue Service would impute interest on any excess capital payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63390 - 2011-05-02
State v. Daren E. Maron
.2d 306, 310, 286 N.W.2d 817, 819 (1980). The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12232 - 2005-03-31
.2d 306, 310, 286 N.W.2d 817, 819 (1980). The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12232 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Timothy L. Demmer
an officer, battery to a law enforcement officer, felony escape, and disorderly conduct. Demmer’s jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21511 - 2017-09-21
an officer, battery to a law enforcement officer, felony escape, and disorderly conduct. Demmer’s jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21511 - 2017-09-21
David Miswald v. Waukesha County Board of Adjustment
that the board's action was within its jurisdiction and decided under a correct theory of law. We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9203 - 2005-03-31
that the board's action was within its jurisdiction and decided under a correct theory of law. We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9203 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 164
this case presents only a question of law. While we generally review questions of law de novo, in appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29283 - 2014-09-15
this case presents only a question of law. While we generally review questions of law de novo, in appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29283 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Industrial Roofing Services, Inc. v. Randy J. Marquardt
of fact and misapplication of the law. Industrial also claims that the court erred when it refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20820 - 2017-09-21
of fact and misapplication of the law. Industrial also claims that the court erred when it refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20820 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jane Hemberger v. Jo Ann Bitzer
and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17172 - 2017-09-21
and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17172 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jeffrey Vis v. Cushman Inc.
contends that the court exercised its discretion based on an erroneous view of the law. We readily find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3027 - 2017-09-19
contends that the court exercised its discretion based on an erroneous view of the law. We readily find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3027 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jason J. Trawitzki
prohibition against double jeopardy. This is a question of law, which we decide de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15917 - 2005-03-31
prohibition against double jeopardy. This is a question of law, which we decide de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15917 - 2005-03-31