Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16591 - 16600 of 50107 for our.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
sentencing discretion. We first address the sufficiency of the evidence. Our standard of review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901358 - 2025-01-22

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
be reversed and remanded for a calculation consistent with the statutory requirements. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980070 - 2025-07-09

State v. Robert K.
subject to our de novo review. Id., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d at 669, 607 N.W.2d at 929. Time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7640 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
our holding as resting on a conclusion that a large quantity of marijuana “could not be easily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67144 - 2011-07-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the age of twelve contrary to § 948.02(1)(b). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017683 - 2025-10-01

[PDF] Randall J. Wilson v. The Estate of Elsie L. Woodford
not substitute our judgment for that of the trial court on issues of weight and credibility of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10313 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion that Kokesh was driving while intoxicated. Our supreme court held in State v. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162969 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111763 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that he would receive concurrent sentences. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422120 - 2021-09-08

State v. Scott G. Hagerman
is that it be supported by probable cause and nothing more. We are bound by the decisions of our supreme court.[2] State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20322 - 2005-11-22