Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16661 - 16670 of 30097 for de.
Search results 16661 - 16670 of 30097 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
question that this court reviews de novo. State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917942 - 2025-02-26
question that this court reviews de novo. State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917942 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
Larry C. Olson v. Charles H. Thompson
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 442, 468 N.W.2d at 23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11517 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 442, 468 N.W.2d at 23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11517 - 2005-03-31
City of Milwaukee v. Michael Frank Machnitzky
of law which this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12957 - 2005-03-31
of law which this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12957 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, so, at the most, the effect of Marchant’s initial comment was de minimis. Moreover, whether a cell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74181 - 2011-11-21
, so, at the most, the effect of Marchant’s initial comment was de minimis. Moreover, whether a cell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74181 - 2011-11-21
[PDF]
State v. Henry Pocan
…. As such … review of the circuit court’s … decision is de novo …. [We] will search the record for any substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18852 - 2017-09-21
…. As such … review of the circuit court’s … decision is de novo …. [We] will search the record for any substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18852 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Patrick Heil v. Green Bay Police and Fire Commission
raise questions of law that we review de novo without deference to the trial court. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4138 - 2017-09-20
raise questions of law that we review de novo without deference to the trial court. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4138 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Keepers
reviews de novo. See id. at 634. No. 00-0475-CR 6 ¶10 Keepers argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2284 - 2017-09-19
reviews de novo. See id. at 634. No. 00-0475-CR 6 ¶10 Keepers argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2284 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to constitutional principals presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶9 The Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108029 - 2014-02-12
to constitutional principals presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶9 The Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108029 - 2014-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. See Welin v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2006 WI 81, ¶16, 292 Wis. 2d 73, 717
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91544 - 2013-01-14
that this court reviews de novo. See Welin v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2006 WI 81, ¶16, 292 Wis. 2d 73, 717
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91544 - 2013-01-14