Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16701 - 16710 of 76632 for see.
Search results 16701 - 16710 of 76632 for see.
State v. Emmanuel D. Johnson
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11142 - 2005-03-31
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11142 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jesse J. Schloemer
. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62(1), STATS. This opinion is subject to further editing. If published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9138 - 2017-09-19
. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62(1), STATS. This opinion is subject to further editing. If published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9138 - 2017-09-19
State v. Roger J. Dotz
an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62, Stats. This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9610 - 2005-03-31
an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62, Stats. This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9610 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kevin Jones
Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14506 - 2005-03-31
Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14506 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. A jury found Lalicata guilty of first-degree sexual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132247 - 2017-09-21
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. A jury found Lalicata guilty of first-degree sexual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132247 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851232 - 2024-09-18
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851232 - 2024-09-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We summarily affirm. In 2017
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958883 - 2025-05-28
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We summarily affirm. In 2017
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958883 - 2025-05-28
State v. Donald J. Van Ryzin
Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14431 - 2005-03-31
Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14431 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2 The order is summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973700 - 2025-06-24
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2 The order is summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973700 - 2025-06-24
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence Earl Parks
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS. No. 98-0599-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13690 - 2014-09-15
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS. No. 98-0599-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13690 - 2014-09-15