Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16721 - 16730 of 30097 for de.
Search results 16721 - 16730 of 30097 for de.
Ohio State Department of Taxation v. Ronald E. Skelton
independently on appeal.” Thus, we review the trial court’s decision de novo. ¶6 Skelton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14445 - 2005-03-31
independently on appeal.” Thus, we review the trial court’s decision de novo. ¶6 Skelton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14445 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by law eliminates summary judgment.” We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118317 - 2014-09-15
by law eliminates summary judgment.” We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118317 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for appointed counsel, which was 1 A de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159365 - 2017-09-21
for appointed counsel, which was 1 A de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159365 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Mequon v. Kenneth Hosale
no alterations to the first floor of the Hosale building.” We review summary judgment issues de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11907 - 2017-09-21
no alterations to the first floor of the Hosale building.” We review summary judgment issues de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11907 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carl F. Hickman
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See Pritsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2101 - 2017-09-19
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See Pritsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2101 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52530 - 2014-09-15
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52530 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we will determine de novo whether those facts establish
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629875 - 2023-03-07
findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we will determine de novo whether those facts establish
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629875 - 2023-03-07
[PDF]
State v. Sabastian Ransom
of law to be reviewed de novo. State v. Harris, 206 Wis. 2d 243, 249-50, 557 N.W.2d 245 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6834 - 2017-09-20
of law to be reviewed de novo. State v. Harris, 206 Wis. 2d 243, 249-50, 557 N.W.2d 245 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6834 - 2017-09-20
Donald Murtaugh v. State
summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6124 - 2005-03-31
summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6124 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
presents a question of law for our de novo review. See State v. Soto, 2012 WI 93, ¶14, 343 Wis. 2d 43, 817
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141073 - 2015-04-28
presents a question of law for our de novo review. See State v. Soto, 2012 WI 93, ¶14, 343 Wis. 2d 43, 817
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141073 - 2015-04-28