Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16791 - 16800 of 65233 for or b.
Search results 16791 - 16800 of 65233 for or b.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2009-10). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76641 - 2014-09-15
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2009-10). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76641 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Brenda Fox v. Daniel Larson
, V. DANIEL LARSON D/B/A TOWN & COUNTRY CONCRETE, DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3766 - 2017-09-19
, V. DANIEL LARSON D/B/A TOWN & COUNTRY CONCRETE, DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3766 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Javee Ralston
. APPEAL from judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: SARAH B. O'BRIEN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10344 - 2017-09-20
. APPEAL from judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: SARAH B. O'BRIEN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10344 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Gary Martin Krutke v. Jodi Ann Krutke
. First, WIS. STAT. § 767.32(1)(b) (2001-02)1 establishes a rebuttable presumption that a substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7602 - 2017-09-19
. First, WIS. STAT. § 767.32(1)(b) (2001-02)1 establishes a rebuttable presumption that a substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7602 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
-2015 Reversed 2015AP000799 Dane County v. T. B. 10-01-2015 Affirmed 2015AP000863 CR State v
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158533 - 2017-09-21
-2015 Reversed 2015AP000799 Dane County v. T. B. 10-01-2015 Affirmed 2015AP000863 CR State v
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158533 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence Earl Parks
that the amendment of the information did not expose Parks to double jeopardy. B. Ineffective Assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13690 - 2014-09-15
that the amendment of the information did not expose Parks to double jeopardy. B. Ineffective Assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13690 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mary C. Behrndt v. Patrick Behrndt
and did not file any answer or other responsive pleading; b. That on April 5, 2000, Patrick Behrndt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2772 - 2017-09-19
and did not file any answer or other responsive pleading; b. That on April 5, 2000, Patrick Behrndt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2772 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Melvina Young v. John S. Wright
B. HIGGINBOTHAM, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. Before Eich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11208 - 2017-09-19
B. HIGGINBOTHAM, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. Before Eich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11208 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: (a) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence which entitles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242202 - 2019-06-19
: (a) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence which entitles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242202 - 2019-06-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
came close to being a “golden rule” argument. B. Alleged Appeal to Have the Jury Consider the Best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101649 - 2017-09-21
came close to being a “golden rule” argument. B. Alleged Appeal to Have the Jury Consider the Best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101649 - 2017-09-21