Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16791 - 16800 of 20975 for word.

COURT OF APPEALS
, and ninth loans were comprised of only new money; in other words, those loans did not pay off any prior loan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145464 - 2015-07-30

[PDF] Leon P. Szleszinski v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
to disqualify Szleszinski. In other words, Windhorst had no plans to rely on an individualized assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19761 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 154
is ambiguous, we may look beyond the words of the regulation to determine the intent behind it. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34133 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
___, ___ (“[C]ourts are not free to ignore the words or phrases chosen by the legislature.”); State v. Young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100034 - 2013-07-29

State v. David E. Polnitz
. Polnitz refused because, in his own words, “I don’t eat b[o]lo[gna].”[5] Thus, the trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4583 - 2005-03-31

Leon P. Szleszinski v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
would be irrelevant to his determination whether to disqualify Szleszinski. In other words, Windhorst
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19761 - 2005-10-27

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 1, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals...
not reflected in the way the consent’s worded…. Again, it simply says “apartment.” It doesn’t say bedroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81796 - 2012-04-30

WI App 56 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1753-CR 2013AP1754-CR ...
of the provisions of subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section.” We emphasize the words “racketeering activity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111193 - 2014-05-27

State v. Thomas J. Paters
to the designated payee. In other words, it is proof only of the existence of the document itself. While the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9500 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
on occasion will misspeak during sentencing and that every ill-advised word will not be the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79467 - 2012-03-12