Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16861 - 16870 of 57970 for a i x.
Search results 16861 - 16870 of 57970 for a i x.
[PDF]
The Third Branch, spring 1997
, Hass received his master’s degree in a d m i n i s t r a t i o n from the University of Notre Dame
/news/thirdbranch/docs/spring97.pdf - 2009-12-02
, Hass received his master’s degree in a d m i n i s t r a t i o n from the University of Notre Dame
/news/thirdbranch/docs/spring97.pdf - 2009-12-02
[PDF]
State v. Terry Griffith
. No. 98-0931-CR 4 I ¶7 Because Griffith's trial counsel did not raise any Fourth Amendment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17384 - 2017-09-21
. No. 98-0931-CR 4 I ¶7 Because Griffith's trial counsel did not raise any Fourth Amendment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17384 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 10
of the court of appeals. I. BACKGROUND ¶4 As we discuss further below, in a common law writ
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938831 - 2025-04-08
of the court of appeals. I. BACKGROUND ¶4 As we discuss further below, in a common law writ
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938831 - 2025-04-08
Frontsheet
. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the court of appeals. I. BACKGROUND[6] ¶3 In 2002, Medtronic applied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35592 - 2009-02-16
. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the court of appeals. I. BACKGROUND[6] ¶3 In 2002, Medtronic applied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35592 - 2009-02-16
[PDF]
State v. Tomas R. Payano-Roman
. I ¶3 The background facts are taken from testimony offered at the suppression hearing. We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25202 - 2017-09-21
. I ¶3 The background facts are taken from testimony offered at the suppression hearing. We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25202 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 16
. Medtronic, Inc., ___ U.S. ___, 128 S. Ct. 999, 1005 (2008) (citing 21 U.S.C. § 360e(d)(6)(A)(i
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35592 - 2014-09-15
. Medtronic, Inc., ___ U.S. ___, 128 S. Ct. 999, 1005 (2008) (citing 21 U.S.C. § 360e(d)(6)(A)(i
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35592 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tomas R. Payano-Roman
. Therefore, Payano-Roman's Fourth Amendment rights were not violated. We reverse the court of appeals. I ¶3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25202 - 2006-05-17
. Therefore, Payano-Roman's Fourth Amendment rights were not violated. We reverse the court of appeals. I ¶3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25202 - 2006-05-17
State v. Colleen E. Hansen
., I Wharton's Criminal Law 509 (11th ed. 1912) ("Same act may constitute two or more offenses which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17512 - 2005-03-31
., I Wharton's Criminal Law 509 (11th ed. 1912) ("Same act may constitute two or more offenses which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17512 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the classroom. Lyla recalled “seeing a distinct bump in his pants” and said “[i]t was quite noticeable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563027 - 2022-09-07
of the classroom. Lyla recalled “seeing a distinct bump in his pants” and said “[i]t was quite noticeable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563027 - 2022-09-07
Lana C. Wittig v. Brian K. Hoffart
conclusions that an injunction was warranted. We affirm. I. ¶2 Hoffart and Wittig were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19357 - 2005-09-19
conclusions that an injunction was warranted. We affirm. I. ¶2 Hoffart and Wittig were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19357 - 2005-09-19