Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16921 - 16930 of 29832 for des.
Search results 16921 - 16930 of 29832 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 92 (citation omitted). We review de novo whether a party has met its burden of establishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108889 - 2014-03-11
N.W.2d 92 (citation omitted). We review de novo whether a party has met its burden of establishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108889 - 2014-03-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Davidson, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69580 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Davidson, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69580 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“a reasonable conclusion using a demonstrated rational process.” Id. We review de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180526 - 2017-09-21
“a reasonable conclusion using a demonstrated rational process.” Id. We review de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180526 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dwayne E. Thompson
of § 973.155(1)(a), STATS., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13235 - 2017-09-21
of § 973.155(1)(a), STATS., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13235 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ohio State Department of Taxation v. Ronald E. Skelton
review the trial court’s decision de novo. ¶6 Skelton contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14445 - 2017-09-21
review the trial court’s decision de novo. ¶6 Skelton contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14445 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jennifer J. Lemon v. Economy Premier Assurance Company
of law; our review is de novo. Badger Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitz, 2002 WI 98, ¶50, 255 Wis. 2d 61, 647
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7033 - 2017-09-20
of law; our review is de novo. Badger Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitz, 2002 WI 98, ¶50, 255 Wis. 2d 61, 647
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7033 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Shannon S. v. Jackson C.
a question of statutory construction, an issue of law, which we review de novo. Smith v. Williams, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7035 - 2017-09-20
a question of statutory construction, an issue of law, which we review de novo. Smith v. Williams, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7035 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Outagamie County v. Town of Greenville
contention presents a question of statutory interpretation, a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15649 - 2017-09-21
contention presents a question of statutory interpretation, a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15649 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
question that this court reviews de novo. State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917942 - 2025-02-26
question that this court reviews de novo. State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917942 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03