Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16921 - 16930 of 29832 for des.

State v. Robert E. Frankwick
). The interpretation of statutes, on the other hand, is a question of law we review de novo. See Grosse v. Protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14432 - 2005-03-31

Kenneth Ness and Susan Ness v. Digital Dial Communications, Inc.
. Statutory construction presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Goff v. Seldera, 202 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11772 - 2005-03-31

Leo W. Ziulkowski v. Gregory M. Nierengarten
is also de novo. Campion v. Montgomery Elevator Co., 172 Wis.2d 405, 410, 493 N.W.2d 244, 246 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9240 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the clearly erroneous standard. Id., ΒΆ27. Second, the court applies the law to those facts de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934383 - 2025-04-01

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6212 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6210 - 2017-09-19

2008 WI APP 149
, our analysis is de novo. See ibid. Unless a statute is ambiguous, we apply it as it stands. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34086 - 2008-10-26

State v. April O.
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., De Pere. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16017 - 2005-03-31

State v. William R. Scott
constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3407 - 2005-03-31

Kirk Bintzler v. Warden Thomas Borgen
by sovereign immunity is a question of law that we decide de novo, Erickson Oil Prods., Inc. v. State, 184 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18284 - 2005-05-25