Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16921 - 16930 of 40074 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 16921 - 16930 of 40074 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. Confucius Gooden
the victim's statement recommending ten years' incarceration. Whether a prosecutor violated the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11869 - 2017-09-21
the victim's statement recommending ten years' incarceration. Whether a prosecutor violated the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11869 - 2017-09-21
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
. Armstrong first argues that the statement he gave to police should have been suppressed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10024 - 2005-03-31
. Armstrong first argues that the statement he gave to police should have been suppressed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10024 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leo Barron Hicks
provided the client would receive monthly billing statements. ¶6 The case was settled in July of 1998
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16662 - 2005-03-31
provided the client would receive monthly billing statements. ¶6 The case was settled in July of 1998
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16662 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
“egregious and serious” assault allegations. This erroneous statement was not corrected during the course
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1085680 - 2026-03-04
“egregious and serious” assault allegations. This erroneous statement was not corrected during the course
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1085680 - 2026-03-04
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
. Armstrong first argues that the statement he gave to police should have been suppressed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10023 - 2005-03-31
. Armstrong first argues that the statement he gave to police should have been suppressed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10023 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Freddie Lee Carter
Smith denied it, did not try to impeach Smith with the officer who took the statement. ¶13 However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4137 - 2017-09-20
Smith denied it, did not try to impeach Smith with the officer who took the statement. ¶13 However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4137 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Michelle S.
) in not suppressing statements made by Michelle S. to a social worker when the social worker did not first warn her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3318 - 2017-09-19
) in not suppressing statements made by Michelle S. to a social worker when the social worker did not first warn her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3318 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
probability of a different result because Wallace’s statement was “based on rank hearsay and lacks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121636 - 2014-09-15
probability of a different result because Wallace’s statement was “based on rank hearsay and lacks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121636 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was unable to hear what was being said in the courtroom and the statements that Johnny said he could not hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75598 - 2011-12-21
was unable to hear what was being said in the courtroom and the statements that Johnny said he could not hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75598 - 2011-12-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
for reconsideration of that statement, arguing he was never allowed to litigate certain issues because the case had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62775 - 2014-09-15
for reconsideration of that statement, arguing he was never allowed to litigate certain issues because the case had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62775 - 2014-09-15