Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17051 - 17060 of 74819 for supreme.

State v. Robert F. Karl
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See ยง 808.10 and rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12279 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Philip O. Rose
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13525 - 2017-09-21

State v. Leslie K. Dent
version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15284 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Joseph T. Eells v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8613 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Louis E. Guerra
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2878 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29885 - 2007-08-01

[PDF] Joseph Schultz v. City of Cumberland
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8426 - 2017-09-19

State v. John E. Isom
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25932 - 2006-08-29

State v. William G. Campbell
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10664 - 2005-03-31

Patrick C. Webster v. David J. Kratochwill
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9917 - 2005-03-31