Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17061 - 17070 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 17061 - 17070 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
was a secured creditor and that there was no equity in the property. Dumke claims Wheeler was an unsecured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33164 - 2008-06-23
was a secured creditor and that there was no equity in the property. Dumke claims Wheeler was an unsecured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33164 - 2008-06-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the Commission made several factual errors. We conclude that, regardless of these claimed errors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235237 - 2019-02-15
the Commission made several factual errors. We conclude that, regardless of these claimed errors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235237 - 2019-02-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of confidential informants. We reject his claims and affirm the circuit court’s order. ¶2 Smith was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76820 - 2014-09-15
of confidential informants. We reject his claims and affirm the circuit court’s order. ¶2 Smith was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76820 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclusion that the issues lacked arguable merit. We also addressed and rejected the claims Edmonson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16
conclusion that the issues lacked arguable merit. We also addressed and rejected the claims Edmonson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16
[PDF]
State v. Donald F. Sheffey
) he was not allowed to present evidence in support of his claim of prosecutorial vindictiveness; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24910 - 2017-09-21
) he was not allowed to present evidence in support of his claim of prosecutorial vindictiveness; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24910 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 974.06 motion for plea withdrawal, claiming his pleas were not knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93884 - 2013-03-11
. Stat. § 974.06 motion for plea withdrawal, claiming his pleas were not knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93884 - 2013-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
substantive claim is that the trial court failed to consider the sentencing guidelines, as required by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51218 - 2010-06-21
substantive claim is that the trial court failed to consider the sentencing guidelines, as required by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51218 - 2010-06-21
[PDF]
State v. Douglas R. Pedersen
the testimony of a witness. Pedersen also claims prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7931 - 2017-09-19
the testimony of a witness. Pedersen also claims prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7931 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to be quit claim deeds Miller signed shortly after the parties were married. Zhu asserts, as we understand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354283 - 2021-04-08
to be quit claim deeds Miller signed shortly after the parties were married. Zhu asserts, as we understand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354283 - 2021-04-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
. STAT. §§ 973.19 (2003-04); 809.30(2) (2003-04). Tillery appeals. ¶5 Tillery’s substantive claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51218 - 2014-09-15
. STAT. §§ 973.19 (2003-04); 809.30(2) (2003-04). Tillery appeals. ¶5 Tillery’s substantive claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51218 - 2014-09-15