Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17111 - 17120 of 75266 for public records.
Search results 17111 - 17120 of 75266 for public records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the stop. Officers also found that there was no recorded activity on his phone in the week leading up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307034 - 2020-11-24
of the stop. Officers also found that there was no recorded activity on his phone in the week leading up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307034 - 2020-11-24
[PDF]
Brown County v. Jessica M.
. The judge referred her to the office of the public defender and delayed the conclusion of the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6634 - 2017-09-20
. The judge referred her to the office of the public defender and delayed the conclusion of the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6634 - 2017-09-20
Brown County v. Jessica M.
of the public defender and delayed the conclusion of the hearing until December 10. On these facts, Jessica
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6635 - 2005-03-31
of the public defender and delayed the conclusion of the hearing until December 10. On these facts, Jessica
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6635 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not procedurally barred, and that there was at least some evidence of record supporting the non-barred portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243978 - 2019-07-23
was not procedurally barred, and that there was at least some evidence of record supporting the non-barred portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243978 - 2019-07-23
Anton Kurzynski v. Allen W. Spaeth D.D.S.
were discussed in the article. Prior to the article's publication, Dr. Faber's attorney served upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7878 - 2005-03-31
were discussed in the article. Prior to the article's publication, Dr. Faber's attorney served upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7878 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Terrence L. Webb
of the penalty enhancer for criminal habituality, although the sentencing record clearly reflects that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10964 - 2017-09-19
of the penalty enhancer for criminal habituality, although the sentencing record clearly reflects that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10964 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was an erroneous exercise of discretion. Because the record supports the circuit court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365159 - 2021-05-11
was an erroneous exercise of discretion. Because the record supports the circuit court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365159 - 2021-05-11
State v. Terrence L. Webb
of the appellate record. The State notes, however, that the sentencing court “specifically recited the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10964 - 2005-03-31
of the appellate record. The State notes, however, that the sentencing court “specifically recited the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10964 - 2005-03-31
WI APP 78 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP823-CR Complete Title ...
citing to evidence in the record to support that assertion. And the circuit court expressly found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97268 - 2013-06-25
citing to evidence in the record to support that assertion. And the circuit court expressly found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97268 - 2013-06-25
State v. Mai X.
evidence that it would be contrary to the best interests of the child or the public to hear the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10842 - 2005-03-31
evidence that it would be contrary to the best interests of the child or the public to hear the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10842 - 2005-03-31