Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17191 - 17200 of 55544 for n c.
Search results 17191 - 17200 of 55544 for n c.
State v. Peggy A. Hampton
)(b)4., Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15243 - 2005-03-31
)(b)4., Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15243 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2006 WI 86, ¶¶8 n.4, 292 Wis. 2d 549, 717 N.W.2d 184 (appellate review of circuit court decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105841 - 2013-12-18
, 2006 WI 86, ¶¶8 n.4, 292 Wis. 2d 549, 717 N.W.2d 184 (appellate review of circuit court decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105841 - 2013-12-18
[PDF]
WI APP 103
was entitled to restitution. Id., ¶62 n.32. Based on the record before us, we uphold the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85662 - 2014-09-15
was entitled to restitution. Id., ¶62 n.32. Based on the record before us, we uphold the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85662 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
). Further, Wis. Stat. § 785.04(1)(d) permits the court to impose “[a]n order designed to ensure compliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47434 - 2010-03-02
). Further, Wis. Stat. § 785.04(1)(d) permits the court to impose “[a]n order designed to ensure compliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47434 - 2010-03-02
Village of Cross Plains v. Kristin J. Haanstad
. For the plaintiff-appellant, there was a brief by Kenneth B. Axe, Paul A. Johnson, Frank C. Sutherland, and Lathrop
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21382 - 2006-02-13
. For the plaintiff-appellant, there was a brief by Kenneth B. Axe, Paul A. Johnson, Frank C. Sutherland, and Lathrop
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21382 - 2006-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS
belated proffer “c[ould] not be heard.” Johnson did not argue in his postconviction or appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34833 - 2008-12-10
belated proffer “c[ould] not be heard.” Johnson did not argue in his postconviction or appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34833 - 2008-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Adrian Castelan-Martinez
. WISCONSIN STAT. § 346.63(1)(c) allows for the prosecution of both OWI and PAC when the charges stem from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24892 - 2017-09-21
. WISCONSIN STAT. § 346.63(1)(c) allows for the prosecution of both OWI and PAC when the charges stem from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24892 - 2017-09-21
Duane S. Jorgensen v. Water Works, Inc.
who is not receiving a fee. … [N]ot necessarily as a dividend, because I don’t believe that these were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2822 - 2013-06-10
who is not receiving a fee. … [N]ot necessarily as a dividend, because I don’t believe that these were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2822 - 2013-06-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2011-12). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118993 - 2014-09-15
judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2011-12). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118993 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the State, the defendant, and the Department of Corrections. Under § 971.39(1)(c), “[t]he defendant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=376161 - 2021-06-16
the State, the defendant, and the Department of Corrections. Under § 971.39(1)(c), “[t]he defendant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=376161 - 2021-06-16