Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1721 - 1730 of 2423 for nys.
Search results 1721 - 1730 of 2423 for nys.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) (The State is required to disclose “[a]ny exculpatory evidence” to the defense.). “Evidence is favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180502 - 2017-09-21
) (The State is required to disclose “[a]ny exculpatory evidence” to the defense.). “Evidence is favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180502 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ingo Stange v. Jane Stange
. See WIS. STAT. § 767.25(1m). In its discretion, a court may consider “[a]ny other factors which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2493 - 2017-09-19
. See WIS. STAT. § 767.25(1m). In its discretion, a court may consider “[a]ny other factors which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2493 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
STAT. § 971.23(1)(h) similarly requires a district attorney to disclose upon demand “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675325 - 2023-07-05
STAT. § 971.23(1)(h) similarly requires a district attorney to disclose upon demand “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675325 - 2023-07-05
Jerald Treat v. Stephen Puckett
, but to give DOC the authority to provide by contract for “[a]ny other matters as are necessary and appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3115 - 2005-03-31
, but to give DOC the authority to provide by contract for “[a]ny other matters as are necessary and appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3115 - 2005-03-31
2011 WI App 67
to interpret a[ny] statute or administrative rule.” See id., ¶26. Rather, the odd-lot doctrine is a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63160 - 2011-05-25
to interpret a[ny] statute or administrative rule.” See id., ¶26. Rather, the odd-lot doctrine is a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63160 - 2011-05-25
[PDF]
WI APP 44
, NY. 2 On behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141324 - 2017-09-21
, NY. 2 On behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141324 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Miguel Gallego v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
or misleading. Section 100.18(1) (emphasis added). The statute further provides that “[a]ny person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20002 - 2017-09-21
or misleading. Section 100.18(1) (emphasis added). The statute further provides that “[a]ny person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20002 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
STATE OF WISCONSIN
)(B)(i) provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time after admission has been convicted of a violation
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/shata.pdf - 2015-04-12
)(B)(i) provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time after admission has been convicted of a violation
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/shata.pdf - 2015-04-12
Frontsheet
for "[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation of the judgment." § 806.07(1)(h). ¶67
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60237 - 2011-02-15
for "[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation of the judgment." § 806.07(1)(h). ¶67
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60237 - 2011-02-15
[PDF]
Brief of Intervenors-Petitioners Citizen Mathematicians and Scientists (A4347441).DOCX
& BLOCK LLP 1155 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Phone: (212) 891-1600 eedmondson
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefctocitizenmath2.pdf - 2021-12-15
& BLOCK LLP 1155 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Phone: (212) 891-1600 eedmondson
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefctocitizenmath2.pdf - 2021-12-15