Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17261 - 17270 of 68502 for did.
Search results 17261 - 17270 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
WI APP 24
and a retired police officer based on a claim to health benefits as a duty-related disability retiree. We did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134238 - 2017-09-21
and a retired police officer based on a claim to health benefits as a duty-related disability retiree. We did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134238 - 2017-09-21
Greendale Education Assocation v. Greendale School District
) the arbitrator exceeded his authority in making the findings and conclusions that he did, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4651 - 2005-03-31
) the arbitrator exceeded his authority in making the findings and conclusions that he did, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4651 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supported a general suspicion about the vehicle, the officer did not have individualized, articulable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106915 - 2017-09-21
supported a general suspicion about the vehicle, the officer did not have individualized, articulable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106915 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a suppression motion did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm. ¶2 On June 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140750 - 2015-04-28
a suppression motion did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm. ¶2 On June 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140750 - 2015-04-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude it did and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The County filed a statement of emergency detention against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201495 - 2017-11-07
conclude it did and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The County filed a statement of emergency detention against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201495 - 2017-11-07
James D. Luedtke v. Daniel Bertrand
’ loss of recreational privileges did not satisfy the “substantial harm” element set forth for the grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13233 - 2005-03-31
’ loss of recreational privileges did not satisfy the “substantial harm” element set forth for the grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13233 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the audience at sentencing and he did not know why they did not get time to speak on his behalf. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83975 - 2012-06-25
in the audience at sentencing and he did not know why they did not get time to speak on his behalf. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83975 - 2012-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
as not to distract the jury because he was happy with the not guilty verdict and did not want the jury to see his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106738 - 2014-01-14
as not to distract the jury because he was happy with the not guilty verdict and did not want the jury to see his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106738 - 2014-01-14
[PDF]
State v. Conrad J. Korbisch
erroneously exercised its discretion in declining to instruct the jury on self-defense; (2) Korbisch did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2838 - 2017-09-19
erroneously exercised its discretion in declining to instruct the jury on self-defense; (2) Korbisch did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2838 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on Roberson’s behalf. She said that she did not view herself as a victim and that she had lied to the police
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613449 - 2023-01-24
on Roberson’s behalf. She said that she did not view herself as a victim and that she had lied to the police
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613449 - 2023-01-24