Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17341 - 17350 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 17341 - 17350 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
CA Blank Order
was dismissed as a read-in at sentencing. Sentencing immediately followed the acceptance of the plea. Both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103800 - 2013-11-05
was dismissed as a read-in at sentencing. Sentencing immediately followed the acceptance of the plea. Both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103800 - 2013-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court denied a suppression motion, which motion contended that the officer improperly entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132589 - 2017-09-21
. The circuit court denied a suppression motion, which motion contended that the officer improperly entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the order denying his postconviction motion seeking to have the DNA surcharge vacated because the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118470 - 2014-09-15
the order denying his postconviction motion seeking to have the DNA surcharge vacated because the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118470 - 2014-09-15
State v. David W. Oakley
at sentencing to withdraw the plea agreement. The court granted the motion to withdraw.[2] Thereafter, Oakley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16335 - 2005-03-31
at sentencing to withdraw the plea agreement. The court granted the motion to withdraw.[2] Thereafter, Oakley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
enhancer was struck and four other counts were dismissed as read-ins. As a result, his maximum sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193094 - 2017-09-21
enhancer was struck and four other counts were dismissed as read-ins. As a result, his maximum sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193094 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
denied Nealy’s motion, and Nealy appeals. We conclude that Nealy’s arguments are without merit, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32893 - 2014-09-15
denied Nealy’s motion, and Nealy appeals. We conclude that Nealy’s arguments are without merit, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32893 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a motion to dismiss, which she did not believe was appropriate. Trial counsel explained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264832 - 2020-06-23
to file a motion to dismiss, which she did not believe was appropriate. Trial counsel explained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264832 - 2020-06-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
voluntarily dismissed the appeal. ¶10 Thomas filed the motion underlying the current appeal in October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147020 - 2017-09-21
voluntarily dismissed the appeal. ¶10 Thomas filed the motion underlying the current appeal in October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147020 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to a new trial because the circuit court erred when it dismissed a juror on the fourth day of trial after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74579 - 2011-11-30
to a new trial because the circuit court erred when it dismissed a juror on the fourth day of trial after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74579 - 2011-11-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erred when it dismissed a juror on the fourth day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74579 - 2014-09-15
is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erred when it dismissed a juror on the fourth day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74579 - 2014-09-15