Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17371 - 17380 of 20373 for sai.

Frontsheet
not say "have not had for at least several months." Rather, the statute gives latitude to the fact-finder
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64253 - 2011-05-16

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Initial Brief of Petitioners
that the contiguity requirement means what it says—all parts of a district must physically touch such that a district
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1016initialbriefpetitioners.pdf - 2023-10-16

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response Brief of Petitioners
position.” Trump, 2020 WI 91, ¶24. The Legislature says it is prejudiced because it “expended substantial
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030responsebriefpet.pdf - 2023-10-30

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response Brief of Governor Evers
, the Constitution says nothing about balancing contiguity. Contiguity is a mandate. The “balancing” described
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030eversresponse.pdf - 2023-10-30

[PDF] Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
be incorrect to say that the State 'exempted' the nontaxed property." Id. at 346. "Rather, one could say
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25816 - 2017-09-21

Todd Jan v. Jerome Foods, Inc.
and, what I worked around and he said there's a good cause right there he said that's he says that I could
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17378 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
2014 WI 123 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2012AP2044-CR COMPLETE TITLE: S...
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130454 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
2016 WI 53 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP2756 COMPLETE TITLE: David...
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170912 - 2017-09-21

Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
other than railroad property being exempt, in which case "it might be incorrect to say that the State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25816 - 2006-07-06

[PDF] Frontsheet
. This exception is what the parties disagree about. Plaintiffs say the exception is good law and it applies
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114525 - 2017-09-21