Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17381 - 17390 of 64755 for b's.
Search results 17381 - 17390 of 64755 for b's.
COURT OF APPEALS
is a change to something); see also 12 U.S.C. § 5220(b)(2) (modifications include a reduction in interest rate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131638 - 2014-12-15
is a change to something); see also 12 U.S.C. § 5220(b)(2) (modifications include a reduction in interest rate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131638 - 2014-12-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Wisconsin Stat. § 971.08(1)(b) requires that before accepting a no contest plea, the circuit court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67959 - 2011-07-13
Wisconsin Stat. § 971.08(1)(b) requires that before accepting a no contest plea, the circuit court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67959 - 2011-07-13
State v. Dale J. Lemke
(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3672 - 2005-03-31
(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3672 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
duty to issue an award. Their argument is based on statutes, mainly Wis. Stat. § 32.08(6)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51818 - 2010-07-07
duty to issue an award. Their argument is based on statutes, mainly Wis. Stat. § 32.08(6)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51818 - 2010-07-07
State v. Barry Bartle
, we affirm. Bartle was charged with interfering with the custody of a child, contrary to § 948.31(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11513 - 2005-03-31
, we affirm. Bartle was charged with interfering with the custody of a child, contrary to § 948.31(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11513 - 2005-03-31
Peters & Vanden Heuvel v. Richard Vanden Heuvel
. On May 2, 1997, the court notified the parties that “[b]ecause of any confusion regarding the signing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14575 - 2005-03-31
. On May 2, 1997, the court notified the parties that “[b]ecause of any confusion regarding the signing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14575 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert Pence v. M&I Central State Bank
neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence which entitles a party to a new trial under s. 805.15(3); (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5086 - 2017-09-19
neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence which entitles a party to a new trial under s. 805.15(3); (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5086 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Morgan V.
potential for responding to future treatment. (b) The type and seriousness of the offense, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14755 - 2017-09-21
potential for responding to future treatment. (b) The type and seriousness of the offense, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14755 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tracy A. Kiefer
, pursuant to § 343.305(10)(b)2, STATS., for refusing to submit to a breath test. Kiefer argues that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10776 - 2017-09-20
, pursuant to § 343.305(10)(b)2, STATS., for refusing to submit to a breath test. Kiefer argues that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10776 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Omowale Nubian Black v. Eleanor Swoboda
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)5, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9726 - 2017-09-19
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)5, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9726 - 2017-09-19