Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17421 - 17430 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 17421 - 17430 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Julie A. Williams v. Paul Nelson
contends that the trial court erred by concluding that there were no disputed issues of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13557 - 2005-03-31
contends that the trial court erred by concluding that there were no disputed issues of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13557 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward L. Snider
Snider. The State argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4673 - 2013-03-31
Snider. The State argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4673 - 2013-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and criminal damage to property, following a jury trial. See WIS. STAT. §§ 947.01(1), 943.01(1). Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134108 - 2017-09-21
and criminal damage to property, following a jury trial. See WIS. STAT. §§ 947.01(1), 943.01(1). Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134108 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
not produce a tape of the informing the accused process. He also argues the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29206 - 2014-09-15
not produce a tape of the informing the accused process. He also argues the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29206 - 2014-09-15
Columbia County v. Keith A. Ballweg
of § 346.63(1), Stats. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11303 - 2005-03-31
of § 346.63(1), Stats. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11303 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Russell A. Sleight v. Vicki L. Sleight
, Michael Sleight, resulting from her third-party claim against him. 1 Vicki argues the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6848 - 2017-09-20
, Michael Sleight, resulting from her third-party claim against him. 1 Vicki argues the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6848 - 2017-09-20
Russell A. Sleight v. Vicki L. Sleight
him.[1] Vicki argues the trial court erred by (1) failing to equally divide the marital estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6848 - 2005-03-31
him.[1] Vicki argues the trial court erred by (1) failing to equally divide the marital estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6848 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William J. Kubacki
the trial court found that Kubacki’s high blood alcohol concentration at NOS. 96-3286-CR 96-3287-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11702 - 2017-09-20
the trial court found that Kubacki’s high blood alcohol concentration at NOS. 96-3286-CR 96-3287-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11702 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of a restricted controlled substance (first offense). The trial court dismissed the State’s charges after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48261 - 2010-03-23
of a restricted controlled substance (first offense). The trial court dismissed the State’s charges after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48261 - 2010-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS
of a child under thirteen. Rockman argues the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26710 - 2006-10-09
of a child under thirteen. Rockman argues the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26710 - 2006-10-09