Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17581 - 17590 of 58337 for speedy trial.
Search results 17581 - 17590 of 58337 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Kieth M. Ferries v. Gerald W. Laabs
of the “newly-discovered evidence” of the policy’s effectiveness. The trial court granted Sharon’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11806 - 2017-09-21
of the “newly-discovered evidence” of the policy’s effectiveness. The trial court granted Sharon’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11806 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that these allegations, if believed by a jury, amount to entrapment. But the trial court granted the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37590 - 2009-07-14
that these allegations, if believed by a jury, amount to entrapment. But the trial court granted the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37590 - 2009-07-14
[PDF]
WI 33
requested a new trial. The court heard his motions on May 4, 2005, and denied both. On May 24, 2005
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28525 - 2014-09-15
requested a new trial. The court heard his motions on May 4, 2005, and denied both. On May 24, 2005
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28525 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Sharon Ferries v. Kieth M. Ferries
of the “newly-discovered evidence” of the policy’s effectiveness. The trial court granted Sharon’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11807 - 2017-09-21
of the “newly-discovered evidence” of the policy’s effectiveness. The trial court granted Sharon’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11807 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
both the trial court’s findings of fact and its conclusion that Smart did not execute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36297 - 2014-09-15
both the trial court’s findings of fact and its conclusion that Smart did not execute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36297 - 2014-09-15
Peter A. Liptak v. Theresa A. Liptak
appeals the property division entered in his divorce judgment.[1] He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
appeals the property division entered in his divorce judgment.[1] He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on ineffective assistance of counsel. Rosalez claims that his trial counsel failed to inform him that, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811625 - 2024-06-11
on ineffective assistance of counsel. Rosalez claims that his trial counsel failed to inform him that, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811625 - 2024-06-11
[PDF]
Nancy L. DeWitt v. Edward L. Jones
. VERGERONT, J. Nancy L. DeWitt, a daughter of Edward L. Jones, appeals the trial court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11509 - 2017-09-19
. VERGERONT, J. Nancy L. DeWitt, a daughter of Edward L. Jones, appeals the trial court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11509 - 2017-09-19
State v. Travis S. Wimpie
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Wimpie claims that: (1) the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4087 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Wimpie claims that: (1) the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4087 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI 33
the jury’s verdict. In the alternative, he requested a new trial. The court heard his motions on May 4, 2005
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28525 - 2007-03-20
the jury’s verdict. In the alternative, he requested a new trial. The court heard his motions on May 4, 2005
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28525 - 2007-03-20