Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17581 - 17590 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 17581 - 17590 of 58500 for speedy trial.
State v. Richard O. Mattingly
postconviction motion for a new trial. Mattingly contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13569 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion for a new trial. Mattingly contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13569 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Nagel
to relief from this court.2 Alternatively, this court disagrees that the trial court committed the errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13302 - 2017-09-21
to relief from this court.2 Alternatively, this court disagrees that the trial court committed the errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13302 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donald Mentzel
. The trial court dismissed Donald Mentzel’s motion for postconviction relief pursuant to § 974.06 for lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12661 - 2017-09-21
. The trial court dismissed Donald Mentzel’s motion for postconviction relief pursuant to § 974.06 for lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12661 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
parental rights to their child, Kayden T. B. Mary argues that the trial court made an error of law when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109395 - 2017-09-21
parental rights to their child, Kayden T. B. Mary argues that the trial court made an error of law when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109395 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
resided at the time of trial. In June 2013, the County filed the petition for the termination of parental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143491 - 2015-06-30
resided at the time of trial. In June 2013, the County filed the petition for the termination of parental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143491 - 2015-06-30
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Voss, Jr.
the statute requires specific intent to commit the crime and the trial court knew from the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8984 - 2017-09-19
the statute requires specific intent to commit the crime and the trial court knew from the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8984 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David A. Bintz
939.05, 1 and an order denying postconviction relief. Bintz argues that (1) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3350 - 2017-09-19
939.05, 1 and an order denying postconviction relief. Bintz argues that (1) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3350 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
waived his Miranda rights. The trial court denied the suppression motion. Thereafter, Rogers pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31859 - 2014-09-15
waived his Miranda rights. The trial court denied the suppression motion. Thereafter, Rogers pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31859 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. Doyle, who was convicted of a dozen crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41860 - 2009-10-05
trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. Doyle, who was convicted of a dozen crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41860 - 2009-10-05
State v. Deondre J. Kelley
argues that he should be resentenced because: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7422 - 2005-05-09
argues that he should be resentenced because: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7422 - 2005-05-09