Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17581 - 17590 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 17581 - 17590 of 58510 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
of Wisconsin. Both Quiles and Progressive had identified Wang as a prospective trial witness. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38825 - 2009-08-03
of Wisconsin. Both Quiles and Progressive had identified Wang as a prospective trial witness. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38825 - 2009-08-03
State v. Deondre J. Kelley
argues that he should be resentenced because: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7422 - 2005-03-31
argues that he should be resentenced because: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7422 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deondre J. Kelley
argues that he should be resentenced because: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7421 - 2005-03-31
argues that he should be resentenced because: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7421 - 2005-03-31
In-Sink-Erator v. Department of Industry
obligation. The trial court disagreed and ruled that the notice was adequate. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9118 - 2005-03-31
obligation. The trial court disagreed and ruled that the notice was adequate. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9118 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian T. Ladwig
)(h)1, Stats. Ladwig argues that the trial court erred by not suppressing two statements he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14522 - 2005-03-31
)(h)1, Stats. Ladwig argues that the trial court erred by not suppressing two statements he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14522 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard O. Mattingly
postconviction motion for a new trial. Mattingly contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13569 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion for a new trial. Mattingly contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13569 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
waived his Miranda rights. The trial court denied the suppression motion. Thereafter, Rogers pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31859 - 2008-02-19
waived his Miranda rights. The trial court denied the suppression motion. Thereafter, Rogers pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31859 - 2008-02-19
[PDF]
In-Sink-Erator v. Department of Industry
known his time limit obligation. The trial court disagreed and ruled that the notice was adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9118 - 2017-09-19
known his time limit obligation. The trial court disagreed and ruled that the notice was adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9118 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 28, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
to support the verdict. Morton also argues that the trial court erred when it granted the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66689 - 2011-06-27
to support the verdict. Morton also argues that the trial court erred when it granted the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66689 - 2011-06-27
[PDF]
Alyson Marklein v. Horizon Investments
their security deposit and unused rent for an apartment. The trial court found that Marklein and Lewis were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13339 - 2017-09-21
their security deposit and unused rent for an apartment. The trial court found that Marklein and Lewis were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13339 - 2017-09-21