Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17591 - 17600 of 40228 for financial disclosure statement.

COURT OF APPEALS
statement made by the City during its rebuttal argument: The more likely event is that he actually went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76458 - 2012-01-11

[PDF] State v. Linda L. McCoy
and that all statements she made must be suppressed because she did not receive the benefit of Miranda 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20295 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. John M. Anderson
of that, I have … to represent myself. Now, somebody got to be effective. Following this statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7103 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
with inconsistent statements regarding the position of the motorcyclists before the accident, when Sprecher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57316 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
had to offer was a statement Michael made in response to a question by the emergency room nurse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104752 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
a statement in which he admitted his involvement in the shootings.[1] At the arraignment, Landrum—who suffers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91094 - 2013-01-02

[PDF] State v. Fred J. Odell
on that. The prosecutor's statements explaining how and by whom Exhibit 4 was created are not evidence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9273 - 2017-09-19

State v. Lester Young
) and (6), the following are not considered hearsay: Those subsections provide as follows: (4) STATEMENTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15919 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on his breath and his statement that he had been “drinking all day” by noting that it is not illegal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694915 - 2023-08-25

[PDF] Local 1901-F v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
credibility, the examiner concluded that the hearsay statements did not satisfy even a preponderance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3985 - 2017-09-20