Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 4337 for bd.

City of Prescott v. Gary Holmgren
The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review independently. State v. Waushara County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25960 - 2006-08-29

[PDF] Aurora Medical Group v. Department of Workforce Development
interpretation of the law de novo. Coutts v. Wisconsin Retirement Bd., 209 Wis. 2d 655, 664, 562 N.W.2d 917
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17406 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 4
and appraisals produced by the owner." State ex rel. Mitchell Aero, Inc. v. Bd. of Review of City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59611 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 57
v. Elections Bd., 106 Wis. 2d 593, 604, 317 N.W.2d 420 (1982
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51544 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response of Intervenors-Petitioners Wright et al. to Consultants' Report
. But that is “an inevitable concomitant of redistricting” in a state with staggered senate elections. Prosser v. Elections Bd
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0208intervenorspetitionersresponse.pdf - 2024-02-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Young v. City of Milwaukee Bd. Of Fire & Police Comm’rs., No. 2019AP1095, unpublished slip op. (WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616559 - 2023-01-31

Frontsheet
asserted in a prospectus and appraisals produced by the owner." State ex rel. Mitchell Aero, Inc. v. Bd
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59611 - 2011-02-01

[PDF] WI 2
and plain duty; (3) substantial damages; and (4) no other adequate remedy at law. Law Enf’t Standards Bd
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903123 - 2025-03-04

Frontsheet
with the proper procedures is also a question of law that we review de novo. Milwaukee Alliance v. Elections Bd
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51544 - 2010-06-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the decision of the local governmental body, not the decision of the circuit court.” Miller v. Zoning Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956363 - 2025-06-25