Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17601 - 17610 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 17601 - 17610 of 58500 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Sharon Ferries v. Kieth M. Ferries
of the “newly-discovered evidence” of the policy’s effectiveness. The trial court granted Sharon’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11807 - 2017-09-21
of the “newly-discovered evidence” of the policy’s effectiveness. The trial court granted Sharon’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11807 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 33
requested a new trial. The court heard his motions on May 4, 2005, and denied both. On May 24, 2005
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28525 - 2014-09-15
requested a new trial. The court heard his motions on May 4, 2005, and denied both. On May 24, 2005
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28525 - 2014-09-15
Peter A. Liptak v. Theresa A. Liptak
appeals the property division entered in his divorce judgment.[1] He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
appeals the property division entered in his divorce judgment.[1] He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that these allegations, if believed by a jury, amount to entrapment. But the trial court granted the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37590 - 2009-07-14
that these allegations, if believed by a jury, amount to entrapment. But the trial court granted the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37590 - 2009-07-14
State v. Andrew M. Obriecht
with a counseling requirement. The trial court then adjudicated Obriecht guilty on the outstanding charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15669 - 2005-03-31
with a counseling requirement. The trial court then adjudicated Obriecht guilty on the outstanding charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15669 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial on four grounds: (1) newly discovered evidence; (2) the denial of the right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616405 - 2023-01-31
trial on four grounds: (1) newly discovered evidence; (2) the denial of the right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616405 - 2023-01-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the County on an issue, and that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. I affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145366 - 2015-07-29
of the County on an issue, and that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. I affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145366 - 2015-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the denial of a postconviction motion seeking a new trial. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Wausau Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135507 - 2015-02-23
, and the denial of a postconviction motion seeking a new trial. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Wausau Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135507 - 2015-02-23
State v. Gary Tate
as applied, Tate argues that the complaint was inadequate to give him notice of the crimes, that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16195 - 2005-03-31
as applied, Tate argues that the complaint was inadequate to give him notice of the crimes, that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16195 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and that $71,000 would fairly compensate her. Schwibinger contends the trial court’s denial of her motion to amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58971 - 2011-01-18
and that $71,000 would fairly compensate her. Schwibinger contends the trial court’s denial of her motion to amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58971 - 2011-01-18