Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1771 - 1780 of 68277 for did.
Search results 1771 - 1780 of 68277 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the State’s plea agreement. Doege also said that he did not understand various aspects of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279070 - 2020-08-19
the State’s plea agreement. Doege also said that he did not understand various aspects of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279070 - 2020-08-19
State v. Derwin D. Jones
for money, which he did not give her. Jones denied using a knife. ¶3 At trial, the victim testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3588 - 2005-03-31
for money, which he did not give her. Jones denied using a knife. ¶3 At trial, the victim testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3588 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 13, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
Court record indicates that on August 21, 2012, the City did not move to dismiss the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132809 - 2015-01-12
Court record indicates that on August 21, 2012, the City did not move to dismiss the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132809 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
observed this turn. ¶4 As to the nature of this first turn, the officer testified that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104327 - 2017-09-21
observed this turn. ¶4 As to the nature of this first turn, the officer testified that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104327 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion to withdraw the plea. He alleges his plea was unknowing because he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36872 - 2009-07-20
his motion to withdraw the plea. He alleges his plea was unknowing because he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36872 - 2009-07-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
raise four arguments, we address only their contention that the circuit court erred when it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000004 - 2025-08-20
raise four arguments, we address only their contention that the circuit court erred when it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000004 - 2025-08-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
defective, making his pleas unknowing, involuntary, and unintelligent; (2) he did not personally enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161401 - 2017-09-21
defective, making his pleas unknowing, involuntary, and unintelligent; (2) he did not personally enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161401 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Veach
of counsel. ¶8 More specifically, the issues are: (1) Did the circuit court erroneously exercise its
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17423 - 2017-09-21
of counsel. ¶8 More specifically, the issues are: (1) Did the circuit court erroneously exercise its
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17423 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael L. Veach
, and the standards for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. ¶8 More specifically, the issues are: (1) Did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17423 - 2005-03-31
, and the standards for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. ¶8 More specifically, the issues are: (1) Did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17423 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald Harris
that Harris was not prejudiced by his counsel’s allegedly deficient performance, and that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2825 - 2005-03-31
that Harris was not prejudiced by his counsel’s allegedly deficient performance, and that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2825 - 2005-03-31