Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1771 - 1780 of 12913 for prosecuting.

[PDF] State v. Dequelvin M. Douglas
would kill him for shooting his leader. The prosecution’s theory was that this was an inter-gang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12005 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Patrick L. M.
petition has prosecutive merit. See WIS. STAT. § 938.18(4)(a). If prosecutive merit is found, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6130 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to the charges of which he is convicted. The plea agreement required the prosecution to cap its sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106582 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Lindholm
of a preliminary examination are: to prevent hasty, malicious, improvident, and oppressive prosecutions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15938 - 2017-09-21

State v. Dequelvin M. Douglas
. The prosecution’s theory was that this was an inter-gang dispute and that Douglas was tired of Bankhead’s leadership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12005 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael Washington
by the prosecution. He argues that under State v. Ludwig, 124 Wis.2d 600, 611, 369 N.W.2d 722, 727 (1985), counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8611 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. At a status hearing on March 13, 2007, the prosecution acknowledged that a plea agreement had been reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49877 - 2010-05-11

2009 WI APP 156
. A person arrested under the DUI law faces the prospect of criminal prosecution and, if found guilty, faces
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41541 - 2009-10-27

State v. Michael Washington
, was constitutionally deficient for not conveying to him a plea offer made by the prosecution. He argues that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8611 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jonathan C. Segner
prosecution witness. We reject his arguments and affirm the judgment and order.[1] ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15355 - 2005-03-31