Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17741 - 17750 of 29713 for des.

Frontsheet
court properly granted summary judgment is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.'" Hocking
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48698 - 2010-04-01

COURT OF APPEALS
court for Grant County: robert p. Van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84993 - 2014-09-11

[PDF] State v. Richard A. Lange
has established a prima facie case for plea withdrawal presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4420 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Jaime R. Peterson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Wausau Tile, Inc., 226 Wis. 2d at 245. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6359 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
regarding the sufficiency of M.A.’s petition are questions of law which this court considers de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269505 - 2020-07-20

COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which we review de novo, without deference to the [trial] court’s determination.” Ansani v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120932 - 2014-09-02

State v. Elgine L. Storlie
de novo, State v. Olson, 217 Wis. 2d 730, 743, 579 N.W.2d 802 (Ct. App. 1998), and the latter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2853 - 2005-03-31

State v. Elgine L. Storlie
de novo, State v. Olson, 217 Wis. 2d 730, 743, 579 N.W.2d 802 (Ct. App. 1998), and the latter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2608 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the application of facts to the legal standard is reviewed de novo by this court. See Koenig v. Pierce Cty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175078 - 2017-09-21

Business Park Development Co., LLC v. Molecular Biology Resources, Inc.
of a contract presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Northern States Power Co. v. National Gas Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7057 - 2005-03-31