Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17751 - 17760 of 69934 for his.
Search results 17751 - 17760 of 69934 for his.
[PDF]
Famous Cases of the Wisconsin Supreme Court - State ex rel. Drankovich v. Murphy
did not specifically inform him of his right to counsel. On the day of his sentence, Drankovich told
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases17.pdf - 2009-11-17
did not specifically inform him of his right to counsel. On the day of his sentence, Drankovich told
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases17.pdf - 2009-11-17
State v. Michael Mackessy
.[1] Michael Mackessy appeals his conviction for disorderly conduct, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 947.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4408 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Michael Mackessy appeals his conviction for disorderly conduct, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 947.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4408 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randy Rivera, Jr.
an order denying his motion to vacate his judgment of conviction for second-degree sexual assault. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10000 - 2017-09-19
an order denying his motion to vacate his judgment of conviction for second-degree sexual assault. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10000 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Maurizzi
a judgment convicting him of burglary. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8212 - 2017-09-19
a judgment convicting him of burglary. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8212 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael Mackessy
Mackessy appeals his conviction for disorderly conduct, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 947.01, attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4408 - 2017-09-19
Mackessy appeals his conviction for disorderly conduct, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 947.01, attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4408 - 2017-09-19
State v. Randy Rivera, Jr.
., pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate his judgment of conviction for second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10000 - 2011-11-14
., pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate his judgment of conviction for second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10000 - 2011-11-14
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for sentence credit. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that Vine was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29449 - 2007-06-20
his motion for sentence credit. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that Vine was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29449 - 2007-06-20
City of Black River Falls v. Douglas W. Spencer
that his conviction was not supported by credible evidence. We disagree and therefore affirm. The City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11667 - 2005-03-31
that his conviction was not supported by credible evidence. We disagree and therefore affirm. The City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11667 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
have lowered his assessed risk of reoffending. No. 2021AP1624 3 Furthermore, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504338 - 2022-04-05
have lowered his assessed risk of reoffending. No. 2021AP1624 3 Furthermore, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504338 - 2022-04-05
[PDF]
Michael A. Stauffacher v. Douglas E. Stoneman
adversely by Stauffacher, was the only witness who testified at the trial. Following his testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10712 - 2017-09-20
adversely by Stauffacher, was the only witness who testified at the trial. Following his testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10712 - 2017-09-20