Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17781 - 17790 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] State v. Richard Dodson
of constitutional proportion and, as such, involves constitutional facts which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10793 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 5
is mixed. We uphold the circuit court findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous and review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131964 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Edwin J. Street
are not disputed, whether the facts establish a constitutional violation is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9521 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. However, we review the [circuit] court’s finding of fact regarding whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265318 - 2020-06-23

City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.
is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 317, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21063 - 2006-02-23

COURT OF APPEALS
trial is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo.” See State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133722 - 2015-01-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the circuit court’s entire ruling is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593478 - 2022-11-23

James R. Schofield v. Raymond E. Smith
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards employed by the circuit court. Guenther v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5864 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 178, 182, 585 N.W.2d 181 (Ct. App. 1998). We review de novo whether a defendant has been denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010283 - 2025-09-18

E. C. Styberg Engineering Company, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
is inappropriate and in favor of de novo review: Honthaners Rests., Inc. v. LIRC, 2000 WI App 273, 240 Wis. 2d 234
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7464 - 2005-03-31