Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17781 - 17790 of 29713 for des.

[PDF] WI App 30
a question of statutory interpretation. “Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211390 - 2018-09-18

State v. Paul F. Rapala
, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). These are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10875 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Gantners Repair, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of law reviewable de novo, when LIRC has a history of expertise and familiarity with a particular field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12867 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient material facts is a question of law we review de novo. See id., ¶9. If the motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174079 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Virtis A.
review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6667 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Edison Liquor Corporation v. United Distillers & Vintners North America, Inc.
for rehearing), and must be material to the question of law presented, De Bonville v. Travelers Insurance Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3035 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether a motion is sufficient is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108337 - 2014-02-24

State v. Gary J. Hazen
of law which we review de novo. See State v. Anderson, 219 Wis. 2d 739, 746, 580 N.W.2d 329 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2770 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jason K.
. The interpretation or application of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2930 - 2005-03-31

2009 WI APP 3
of law that we review de novo. Sands v. Whitnall Sch. Dist., 2008 WI 89, ¶14, __ Wis. 2d __, 754 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35069 - 2009-01-27