Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17801 - 17810 of 24724 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Total Biaya Membangun Taman Mini Buat Rumah Minimalis Wonosegoro Boyolali.

State v. Michael J. Lindholm
year in the county jail if the total number of suspensions, revocations and convictions counted under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15938 - 2005-03-31

State v. Duane A. Earley
that he was stopped or going one to two miles per hour when the accident occurred. ¶20 The totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3616 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of supervision with a possible ten-year sentence hanging over Hildebrand were totally frustrated by the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49877 - 2010-05-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a victim. The circuit court imposed sentences totaling seven years’ initial confinement followed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742123 - 2023-12-19

CA Blank Order
reliable under the totality of the circumstances”).[4] B. Sufficiency of the Evidence Next
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106932 - 2014-01-14

COURT OF APPEALS
perhaps can give back some sense of safety. It will never totally come back for this victim, Judge. It’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32501 - 2008-04-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
sentences totaling six years of initial confinement followed by seven years of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768452 - 2024-02-27

State v. Ralph F. Beilke
to a total of three years. You understand that? MR. BEILKE: Yes. THE COURT: Does that make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12155 - 2005-03-31

Yolanda Springfield-Woodard v.
and June of that year, eight checks totaling $6668.41 were deposited into the law firm's trust account
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17103 - 2005-03-31

Adolph F. Cebula v. Thomas Cotter
on this point, however. The sum total of their argument on the merits of the court’s decision is as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2635 - 2005-03-31