Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 181 - 190 of 15294 for probate.
Search results 181 - 190 of 15294 for probate.
[PDF]
WI APP 102
supervision based on conduct that occurred during his probation period. McElvaney asserts that his term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32888 - 2014-09-15
supervision based on conduct that occurred during his probation period. McElvaney asserts that his term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32888 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
improperly revoked his extended supervision based on conduct that occurred during his probation period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32888 - 2008-07-29
improperly revoked his extended supervision based on conduct that occurred during his probation period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32888 - 2008-07-29
[PDF]
Lee A. Knowlin v. David H. Schwarz
dismissing his petition for a writ of certiorari challenging his probation revocation. We affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3600 - 2017-09-19
dismissing his petition for a writ of certiorari challenging his probation revocation. We affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3600 - 2017-09-19
Dwayne G. Thomas v. David M. Schwarz
probation. Thomas’s probation was revoked based on his violation of the terms of his probation while he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18649 - 2005-06-21
probation. Thomas’s probation was revoked based on his violation of the terms of his probation while he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18649 - 2005-06-21
Lee A. Knowlin v. David H. Schwarz
of certiorari challenging his probation revocation. We affirm the order. ¶2 Knowlin was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3600 - 2005-03-31
of certiorari challenging his probation revocation. We affirm the order. ¶2 Knowlin was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3600 - 2005-03-31
State v. David J. Clark
of probation as to each count. The probation terms were ordered to run concurrent to each other. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4443 - 2005-03-31
of probation as to each count. The probation terms were ordered to run concurrent to each other. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4443 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the sentence is successfully completed, which means in part satisfying “the conditions of probation.” Sec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165180 - 2017-09-21
as the sentence is successfully completed, which means in part satisfying “the conditions of probation.” Sec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165180 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
an amended judgment of conviction extending and modifying his probation. Jensen argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50570 - 2014-09-15
an amended judgment of conviction extending and modifying his probation. Jensen argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50570 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction extending and modifying his probation. Jensen argues he was not afforded due process because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50570 - 2010-06-01
of conviction extending and modifying his probation. Jensen argues he was not afforded due process because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50570 - 2010-06-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
to reconfine No. 2009AP250-CR 2 him because his probation had been improperly revoked several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44875 - 2014-09-15
to reconfine No. 2009AP250-CR 2 him because his probation had been improperly revoked several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44875 - 2014-09-15